Fry Up: Written but never sent
LATEST NEWS
- Wellington gears up for Digital Earth summit
- ComCom investigation prompted by "competitors": Sky TV
- New email delays 'different issue', now fixed -Telecom || 2
- Certus Solutions achieves top ranking from SPI Research
- ComCom to investigate Sky TV's contracts with telcos || 3
- Small fortune in the phones we throw away || 1
SUBSCRIBE
Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly. Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Complaints department
By Sarah Putt | Auckland | Friday, 28 October, 2011 | 5 Comments
Ministerial correspondence
A tatty faded white envelope was found on the steps of the Fry Up offices this morning. There was a stamp on the envelope but no postmark. On a post-it note attached to the envelope someone had scrawled in blue ink “Thought you might find this ministerial correspondence from 1990 of interest given the Telecom split this week – written but never sent”.
Dear Sirs (well if you play your cards right, ha ha)
It’s great to be back in the hot seat after the previous PM bumped me for flogging the national airline. He might crave a cup of tea but we’re drinking champagne in this office.
Seriously chaps, I’m becoming a bit thoughtful about this upcoming deal to sell Telecom.
She’s an isolated country at the bottom of the Pacific and staying in touch with the rest of the world is pretty vital. I was reading a pamphlet about Julius Vogel the other day and learned the government in the 1870s built a trans-Tasman cable at an annual cost of fifteen thousand pounds a year. It wasn’t cheap at the time but it was among the first of many investments in communications that taxpayers in this country have been making for generations.
The other day I had the member for an Auckland suburb in here prattling on about a thing called the world wide web and how television is going to be delivered over the phone line. I know, crazy talk, but what if he’s right? Would private investors pay for that kind of technology to be delivered to every citizen?
Hell yeah! The free market always delivers. But... what if it doesn’t?
What if I sell you and your US mates Telecom and they take the profits off the voice service and only incrementally invest in this cool new stuff. Will that Kiwishare thing we discussed be enough to ensure that all citizens, wherever they live, get equal access or will a future generation of taxpayers have to buy back the network because – and it feels like heresy to write this – the free market didn’t deliver?
I mentioned this to the PM over a feed of fish and chips and he raised the R word. I quickly replied its industry organisations that will be sorting out the rules – not the government.
But now I’m not so sure. It’s not your offer - $4.25 billion is a damn fine sum - it's just I’m thinking we keep Telecom a bit longer, see how this TV-wire thing pans out. Maybe wait to see what other countries do in this area so we can learn from them before flogging off this really, really valuable asset.
I trust you will understand my decision not to sell Telecom and also that it won’t damper your enthusiasm for sponsoring art galleries and yacht races because that stuff goes down a treat with the voters.
Yours etc
Diminishing SOE Minister
A "properly mandated Chorus and an "unleashed Telecom"
Telecom demerger approved
Musical Mario
Complaints department
On Friday October 6 Fry Up featured a photograph of the office fax machine. On the Monday following publication this correspondence – pictured below - was faxed from a location in Hamilton. It took 15 working days before anybody in the office noticed.
Comments
Minister for WWW
I showed Maurice Williamson the Web for the first time. It was 1994.
Posted by Anonymous at 23:55:11 on October 28, 2011
Posted by Anonymous at 23:55:11 on October 28, 2011
An Auckland member
Maurice always was a forward-thinking kind of a bloke.
Even got to put "FCSNZ" after his name IIRC
Posted by Anonymous at 20:44:56 on October 28, 2011
Even got to put "FCSNZ" after his name IIRC
Posted by Anonymous at 20:44:56 on October 28, 2011
1990 or 1991?
On page 104 of Connecting the Clouds by Keith Newman (published in assoc with InternetNZ 2008): "The World Wide Web (www or Web), which had come into existence in 1990 as a system for organising information, proved to be the breakthrough that took the Internet mainstream".
Of course its arguable if a member for an Auckland suburb would have been aware of it. A few paras later Newman writes: "The first tools, and the concept that would become the Web, were released into the public domain on 6 August 1991."
Posted by Sarah Putt at 16:49:31 on October 28, 2011
Of course its arguable if a member for an Auckland suburb would have been aware of it. A few paras later Newman writes: "The first tools, and the concept that would become the Web, were released into the public domain on 6 August 1991."
Posted by Sarah Putt at 16:49:31 on October 28, 2011
WWW
maybe the imaginary Minister read about it on Usenet?
Posted by Tim Burners Leigh at 16:45:23 on October 28, 2011
Posted by Tim Burners Leigh at 16:45:23 on October 28, 2011
WWW
As the WWW was not made public until 1991, I doubt a Minister, even a parody one, was talking about it in 1990.
Posted by David Farrar at 16:00:14 on October 28, 2011
Posted by David Farrar at 16:00:14 on October 28, 2011
MOST POPULAR
Social Media @Computerworld NZ

Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.






