“Above the law” execs catalyst for BYO revolution, says IBM
LATEST NEWS
- NZ game industry: Govt support for development increasing
- Telecom opens pre-orders for Samsung Galaxy S III || 4
- Video, connection costs major factors in broadband uptake: ComCom
- No more risk to privacy on Facebook, than web: MED
- Raspberry Pi arrives in New Zealand || 4
- InternetNZ invites ICT organisations to meet
SUBSCRIBE
Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly. Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Executive culture and Christmas buying means IT managers should set BYO policies as a matter of urgency
By Sim Ahmed | Auckland | Wednesday, 7 December, 2011 | 9 Comments
Executives at many large companies are ignoring internal IT policies by bringing their own devices to work, often to the detriment of corporate security, says David Cannon, enterprise offering leader at IBM.
“Executives often think of themselves as above the law when it comes to IT policy,” says Cannon.
“And depending on the company, sometimes they are, and the IT teams just have to adapt.”
Speaking over breakfast before presenting an IBM sponsored seminar on mobile security, Cannon gave Computerworld an example of a prominent banking executive who had won an iPhone at an event, and demanded his IT team synchronise it with the bank's BlackBerry Enterprise Server. Until then, the executive would forward business emails to his unsecured personal Gmail account so he could retrieve them on his new iPhone.
Cannon says most large companies have not kept up with the speed of change in the mobile space, and do not have specific policies regarding mobile working.
He adds that while it is refreshing to see enthusiasm for technology coming from the top down, IT managers need to be careful to set the best policy for their systems.
"Often we are finding IT is being dictated IT policy by other staff, when it really should be the other way around," says Cannon.
Dennis O’Shea, CEO of Mobile Mentor, who also spoke at the seminar, recommends that every CIO and IT manager has a BYO technology policy in place by the New Year.
The former director of Nokia New Zealand, says there will be a demand for BYO devices as employees snap up reduced price smartphones and tablets over the Christmas period.
“At this point smartphones are often just as cheap as feature phones,” says O’Shea. "Employees are going to expect to be able to do their work on these devices."
He says while malware is always a risk, the greatest threat to an organisation is generally through user carelessness and data loss, and says any BYO policy should address this.
"What I recommend to my clients is their policy meets their employees somewhere in the middle," says O'Shea.
"Let them bring in their own devices but you manage it and maintain security. You should always be able to go in and make a backup of important information, or remotely wipe the entire phone if you need to."
Comments
Another evolution
just like cloud is the next evolution of application delivery, the consumerisation of IT is also another evolution. There will be two camps, those that embrace and those that do not. There are solutions around today which will enable IT to allow any device, buy remain in control of policy, application delivery etc. I personally think its an exciting time ahead and really allows employees to be the most productive they can be.
However I dont think its executives which are driving this. I think its a combination of new device technology which blurs the line between phone and pc and gen y entering the workplace with new expectations in terms of how they want to be able to work. Their work style is quite different, and embracing any device etc allows them to be their productive best.
Posted by JB at 19:09:37 on December 8, 2011
However I dont think its executives which are driving this. I think its a combination of new device technology which blurs the line between phone and pc and gen y entering the workplace with new expectations in terms of how they want to be able to work. Their work style is quite different, and embracing any device etc allows them to be their productive best.
Posted by JB at 19:09:37 on December 8, 2011
typical big blue brother
just like IBM, holier than thou, bossing business about because they think they know best. maybe they should get their apps into this century and get them working on iphones, rather than complaining about execs wanting to use current technology. stick of IBM protecting their own interests rather than the interests of the customer
Posted by Anonymous at 21:31:57 on December 7, 2011
Posted by Anonymous at 21:31:57 on December 7, 2011
RE: typical big blue brother
Not quite sure what "anonymous" is referring in the statement above. Although looking at the spelling and grammar suggests perhaps he/she is not the sharpest pencil in the case.
I think the comments from a company of over 300,000 people is very relevant for the BYOD "revolution.
Posted by Iain at 17:19:10 on December 12, 2011
I think the comments from a company of over 300,000 people is very relevant for the BYOD "revolution.
Posted by Iain at 17:19:10 on December 12, 2011
typical big blue brother
I didn't find any complaining about the use of iphones in the transcript above, or at the actual seminar it refers to. To the contrary, IBM's message was that staff are going to use iphones, androids, etc regardless of what the IT department wants, and that research shows that this is already happening, and that it creates a security risk if not properly managed (e.g. no PIN to unlock iPad containing sensitive data, etc).
IBM seems to be offering a way to let companies give their employees the choice to choose their own device, integrate it with the corporate infrastructure, and maintain IT security. This actually creates more value for the business, since the employees could potentially get full access to all corporate apps rather than being limited to mail and calendar on their mobile device.
Of course, I agree it would be great to see some of their apps move to iOS as well, but this is already a progressive step in the right direction!
(and no, I am not an IBM employee)
Posted by Anonymous at 14:04:00 on December 8, 2011
IBM seems to be offering a way to let companies give their employees the choice to choose their own device, integrate it with the corporate infrastructure, and maintain IT security. This actually creates more value for the business, since the employees could potentially get full access to all corporate apps rather than being limited to mail and calendar on their mobile device.
Of course, I agree it would be great to see some of their apps move to iOS as well, but this is already a progressive step in the right direction!
(and no, I am not an IBM employee)
Posted by Anonymous at 14:04:00 on December 8, 2011
Meeting in the middle
One thing to think about is the impact of using 'personal' devices for 'work'. I've already refereed one situation where sensitive data was on a leaving employees device and they would not accept the device had to be wiped or cleansed - it was 'their' device not the companies. I have also seen someone present an employer with an invoice for 'renting' work time on his iPad !!
Responsibility for security has shifted from purely a business issue and solution to a shared issue with the employee taking ownership for the device and the data on it - think of it as the custodian. More and more individuals are being asked to take on this role and it will only get worse.
Technology is one part and I agree that from a security perspective it is about knowing the risks and having strategies in place to manage them. Saying no is no longer an option.
Posted by Anonymous at 17:05:29 on December 7, 2011
Responsibility for security has shifted from purely a business issue and solution to a shared issue with the employee taking ownership for the device and the data on it - think of it as the custodian. More and more individuals are being asked to take on this role and it will only get worse.
Technology is one part and I agree that from a security perspective it is about knowing the risks and having strategies in place to manage them. Saying no is no longer an option.
Posted by Anonymous at 17:05:29 on December 7, 2011
Who's going to pay?
The real problem is not one of policy but who will pay for the inclusion of all these new methods of access? Integrating into the mountains of legacy applications that businesses have built up over the last few decades is not going to be cheap. All those future-proof application development strategies were binned when the applications were given approval.....and now IT has to magically and retrospectively "integrate" them all.
We've been really lucky with the ease of email integration but when you start looking at the cost of everything else.....very scary.
"Just wise up IT - get with the program" - for free! It is the internet age after all? :-)
Posted by Anonymous at 14:35:49 on December 7, 2011
We've been really lucky with the ease of email integration but when you start looking at the cost of everything else.....very scary.
"Just wise up IT - get with the program" - for free! It is the internet age after all? :-)
Posted by Anonymous at 14:35:49 on December 7, 2011
What a load of....
That's just soooo typical!
IT departments stop whining and complaining! Get into this millenium please! Smartphones, own gear is commonplace and will become ven more prevalent. Instead of adapting you're trying to turn back the clock.
I just see this as people failing in their job to come up with a proper and resilient IT policy that fits modern times.
And translated into management speak....if you let IT policy restrict what you do you WILL lose your competitive edge.
Keep up for G**** sake.
Posted by Anonymous at 13:32:45 on December 7, 2011
IT departments stop whining and complaining! Get into this millenium please! Smartphones, own gear is commonplace and will become ven more prevalent. Instead of adapting you're trying to turn back the clock.
I just see this as people failing in their job to come up with a proper and resilient IT policy that fits modern times.
And translated into management speak....if you let IT policy restrict what you do you WILL lose your competitive edge.
Keep up for G**** sake.
Posted by Anonymous at 13:32:45 on December 7, 2011
What a load of....
Bet you have not been around in IT for long or you would know that the biggest risk to your company & hence your job is someone losing a device with company sensitive data. There are criminals who target smart phone devices, wireless access points, usb drives etc not to bring your systems down but to sell the data to other companies. Quite often this does not hit the news but a competitor wins a critical RFC with a cheaper/better offer. Setting up proper policy takes time & money. Try getting the CEO to agree that IT has the ability to wipe a smart phone remotely any time of the day & see how far that gets you.
Posted by BTW at 16:33:46 on December 8, 2011
Posted by BTW at 16:33:46 on December 8, 2011
What a load of....
I read this article and thought of it more as a wake up call for IT to get ready for more and more user-brought technology.
Agree though, IT restrictions in big companies can stifle innovation, I like the comment towards the end about meeting employees half way.
Posted by Anonymous at 13:41:18 on December 7, 2011
Agree though, IT restrictions in big companies can stifle innovation, I like the comment towards the end about meeting employees half way.
Posted by Anonymous at 13:41:18 on December 7, 2011
MOST POPULAR
- Google search will incorporate 'knowledge graph'
- Chorus extends introductory fibre trial for RSPs until December
- IBM boosts returns to parent company, paying $20m to US
- Raspberry Pi arrives in New Zealand
- Wellington gears up for Digital Earth summit
- J*******k: Dirty word disappears from Apple iTunes store
Social Media @Computerworld NZ

Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.






