Claims that US fears of Chinese sank Pacific Fibre exaggerated: Drury
LATEST NEWS
SUBSCRIBE
Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly. Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Rod Drury hits back at ICT Minister comments not requiring second cable for UFB success
By Sim Ahmed | Auckland | Thursday, 2 August, 2012 | 13 Comments
The idea that Pacific Fibre was sunk due to American fears of Chinese investment and espionage has “taken a life of its own”, says Rod Drury.
“There’s a bit of sensationalism in all this,” he says.
Drury says there was some political pressure from the US regarding Pacific Fibre’s proposed $400 million cable, but this was for the most part posturing for a better deal.
“We were told it would be difficult to connect a 100 percent Chinese invested cable,” says Drury.
Drury says this political wrangling was not something the team at Pacific Fibre were experienced in, but they tried to mitigate risks by managing who they worked with.
Pacific Fibre’s vendor for undersea fibre technology was SubCom, an American company. Drury says he hoped this partnership would ease any concerns the US had about Chinese interests in the cable.
On advice from New Zealand Trade and Enterprise and Trade Minister Tim Groser, Drury says Pacific Fibre sought investment from an approved group of Chinese investors.
But he believes what really sunk Pacific Fibre was a lack of domestic investment and further government support.
“This would have been much easier if there was substantial New Zealand content in the funding,” says Drury.
Drury says investment from NZ Super Fund would have been appropriate and could have saved the venture. The superannuation group has a mandate to invest in critical New Zealand infrastructure, which Drury says the Pacific Fibre cable would come under.
A spokesperson for NZ Super Fund told Computerworld it did not invest in Pacific Fibre because Pacific Fibre did not pass its due diligence.
“ Ultimately we were unable to gain enough confidence in the opportunity, for our purposes,” says the spokesperson.
“Any investment we make needs to generate sufficient returns for the risk we have to take on, relative to other investment opportunities both domestically and internationally.”
In response to ICT Minister Amy Adam’s comment that UFB success is not dependent on a second international internet cable, Drury says this shows the minister’s lack of understanding in this space.
“An argument is we could just cache overseas content, but these people don’t understand that’s not all New Zealanders want to do online. We want to use live communication. What about multi-video Skype chats, what about Google Hangouts?,” says Drury.
Drury, who is also the CEO of cloud accounting tool Xero, says because of poor international connectivity his company has been forced to hire sales managers overseas in order to conduct webinars and sales pitches online.
Drury says Southern Cross does have additional international capacity, but there is no incentive for it to open that up without competition from another player.
“Southern Cross is acting completely rationally, they need to maximise the return from their monopoly cable,” says Drury.
“They could give us more bandwidth for less, but the more capacity they use the closer they get to footing up hundreds of millions of their own money to increase capacity.”
Drury says he is conscious that Pacific Fibre’s folding will make it difficult for other private cable ventures to succeed as investors will be reluctant to sign up once more.
Comments
reply
The mortgage loans are important for people, which are willing to start their career. In fact, this is easy to receive a student loan.
Posted by BENJAMINPetra at 8:08:03 on August 8, 2012
Posted by BENJAMINPetra at 8:08:03 on August 8, 2012
I think it all comes down to this..
"A spokesperson for NZ Super Fund told Computerworld it did not invest in Pacific Fibre because Pacific Fibre did not pass its due diligence."
The reason it failed would be it was not a good deal for investors. I suspect that Rod and Co where greedy and put a ridiculous valuation on there role for putting the deal together.
Posted by Anonymous at 16:42:12 on August 3, 2012
The reason it failed would be it was not a good deal for investors. I suspect that Rod and Co where greedy and put a ridiculous valuation on there role for putting the deal together.
Posted by Anonymous at 16:42:12 on August 3, 2012
No one will care until..
One side of SC is down for two weeks waiting for the cable repair ship and the other side gets hit. Then we are in the dark ages. There is less than 200Mb/s of copper capacity left to run the whole country. Oh yea, and the Warkworth satellite station is mothballed, forget that.
Posted by Anonymous at 12:28:53 on August 3, 2012
Posted by Anonymous at 12:28:53 on August 3, 2012
No one will care until..
Or even worse Telecom subdivides the land for townhouses - it might the only way it can make more money :)
Posted by Longreach at 13:52:24 on August 5, 2012
Posted by Longreach at 13:52:24 on August 5, 2012
No one will care until..
and with people like you rid off, TNZ is likely in a good position to do so.
Posted by Anonymous at 11:29:32 on August 6, 2012
Posted by Anonymous at 11:29:32 on August 6, 2012
Sad bunch of comments
Mr Drury is absolutely right it is a disaster not to have a second cable. 1 for redundancy / fall back, 2 for competition, 3 to enable NZ's IT industry to deliver services at blistering speed. But no as per normal in NZ the government of the day has opted yet again not to stimulate competition. Knowledge economy - well not here, let's move some more sheep around. Dumb, stupid & it sucks.
Posted by Anonymous at 10:59:07 on August 3, 2012
Posted by Anonymous at 10:59:07 on August 3, 2012
Let it go
The more this drags on, the more this smacks of sour grapes and spurned egos. Get over it, PF: you tried, you failed. Despite successes in other areas, you're not invincible. Let's not drag this on and on, pointing the finger at everyone but yourselves.
Posted by Anonymous at 10:20:00 on August 3, 2012
Posted by Anonymous at 10:20:00 on August 3, 2012
Interesting...
"There's a bit of sensationalism in all this," he says.
That's what it boils down too...
Let's not forget the facts here, XERO is very successful and is a great NZ story. But it's all offshore. What would be interesting is to know why it's offshore.
And when will XERO be sold off to some international provider?
Posted by Harry Finch at 18:40:23 on August 2, 2012
"There's a bit of sensationalism in all this," he says.
That's what it boils down too...
Let's not forget the facts here, XERO is very successful and is a great NZ story. But it's all offshore. What would be interesting is to know why it's offshore.
And when will XERO be sold off to some international provider?
Posted by Harry Finch at 18:40:23 on August 2, 2012
Interesting...
If you define success as running multimillion dollar losses and burning venture capital for their etire existence then yes they are doing very well.
Posted by Anonymous at 11:59:41 on August 3, 2012
Posted by Anonymous at 11:59:41 on August 3, 2012
Interesting...
Well said. Claiming a market capitalisation of what was it $560M? is hilarious.
Posted by Anonymous at 12:03:07 on August 6, 2012
Posted by Anonymous at 12:03:07 on August 6, 2012





