E-learning approach “disjointed”, says Newman
Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
Get the latest news from Computerworld delivered via email.
Sign up now
Electronically assisted learning can be the “killer application” supporting use of the ultrafast and rural broadband initiatives, says former TUANZ CEO Ernie Newman. However, he warns, New Zealand is failing to “play as a team around e-learning”.
“Professional jealousies among a range of interests, organisations, government institutions, private service providers, faculties of education and others are resulting in a highly disjointed approach.”
Newman makes his remarks in one of the submissions to the Education and Science Parliamentary select committee’s inquiry into 21st-century learning, sparked by National MP Nikki Kaye.
TUANZ used to run an annual one-day event, aimed at helping teachers “get to grips with modern teaching and learning techniques.”
“It was funded by commercial sponsorship, schools, and a grant from the Ministry of Education, until about 2008 when the ministry reduced the funding and made the events non-viable,” Newman writes.
The inquiry has attracted more than 90 submissions from a wide variety of commentators, including official bodies such as the National Council of Women and the Council for Educational Research, and ICT companies such as Microsoft and Catalyst IT.
Most of the submissions have great hopes for technology in assisting and reforming learning, but there is some difference of opinion over whether it fits at the front or back end of the reform process.
“Helicoptering in technology” over an existing structure and expecting this to achieve reform won’t have good outcomes, says Nat Torkington. “Successful use of technology requires teachers who know what’s possible and how to achieve it,” he writes.
Other submissions admit some role for technology in inspiring ideas on change. It can help “to support more advanced pedagogical approaches; to reconceptualise the learning environment; to make learning visible,” says Microsoft. These are “critical factors in driving learning outcomes”.
Several submissions touch on the strength of technology in “making learning visible” - showing clearly when a student has mastered a topic and when lack of progress indicates a need for help.
In terms of reorganising the way learning happens, there is a good deal of support for making classrooms more open-plan in layout (though one submitter points a failed experiment in Western Australia, whose schools have gained permission to “put the walls back up”).
The “flipped classroom” is widely discussed — learning material is sent out to students at home and the role of the teacher in the class is to guide its use rather than convey the content.
Open source companies Catalyst and E-gressive put in a word for the potential reduction in cost from using free open-source software. This often matches the quality of proprietary offerings, says E-gressive’s Dave Lane. “Where it is arguably not quite as feature rich, it can easily be argued that the ‘high end features’ are not crucial to students’ requirements and are definitely not worth the cost and the sacrificed openness that using the proprietary software requires.”
I agree with the comments that 21st Century Learning should not focus on the technology. Technology is just one of the tools that will form part of achieving 21st Century Learning that achieves the best results for students and their communities.
Posted by Waldo (Microsoft) at 8:28:02 on June 29, 2012
I endorse Niki's comment re coherence. I believe that all parties, irrespective of their position in the value chain, need to be working together to achieve system coherence, so that we end up with solutions that really do advantage schools, teachers and learners.
Posted by Derek Wenmoth at 17:03:31 on June 19, 2012
'Computerworld' needs to join in to work towards clarifying the vision and co-evolution of education and digital technologies for effective schooling in the near future of New Zealand. The vision is what will enable coherence and it is one that must continue to develop with the co-evolution of both education and digital technologies.
I for one am pleased to see the politicians of all parties stimulating and discussing views in ways that should engage communities and commercial services as well as the education sector. I have also been involved in a number of submissions:
DEANZ, VLNC, and the University of Canterbury-Learning Lab, which I direct.
I have also followed on with a response to the Christchurch rebuild, which has some links. I'll be happy to provide copies when requested; my details are public available on the web.
University of Canterbury Professor of e-Learning
Posted by Professor Niki Davis at 16:26:56 on June 19, 2012