European Parliament rejects ACTA copyright treaty by 478 votes to 39
LATEST NEWS
SUBSCRIBE
Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly. Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Members of the European Parliament rejected the controversial Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement on Wednesday by 478 votes to 39
By Jennifer Baker | Brussels | Thursday, 5 July, 2012 | 5 Comments
Members of the European Parliament rejected the controversial Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement on Wednesday by 478 votes to 39.
The result had been widely expected internationally and means that the agreement cannot become law in the European Union or any of its member states. The vote came after a last-ditch attempt by the European People's Party to have it delayed was shot down.
Digital civil liberties groups have hailed the result as a huge victory for citizens, following a concerted campaign to reject the anti-piracy agreement, which aims to enforce intellectual property rights.
ACTA was signed by the European Commission and 22 E.U. member states in January, but following widespread civil protests throughout Europe, many countries back-pedaled on their decision to sign. The major sticking point is the digital chapter, which protesters say leaves the door open for countries to force Internet service providers to police their own customers.
Parliamentarians were also angry that the deal was largely negotiated in secret and only came to light when an initial draft was released by Wikileaks in 2008. French member of the European Parliament, Kader Arif, responsible for assessing the agreement, resigned from his post in January calling the negotiations a masquerade.
And in April, Europe's top data privacy watchdog, the European Data Protection Supervisor, criticized the anti-piracy agreement, warning that it could lead to widespread monitoring of the Internet and breaches of individuals' right to privacy.
As more and more pressure was piled upon Parliament to reject the deal, the European Commission, the body responsible for negotiating the agreement on behalf of the E.U., asked the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for its opinion and urged the Parliament to wait for a ruling. The European People's Party on Wednesday morning called a vote on whether to delay a decision on ACTA until after the ECJ ruling, but were out-voted by their colleagues, 420 to 255.
Despite the rejection of the deal outright, the ECJ will still assess the question of whether or not it is compatible with E.U. law, but this is now an academic exercise.
The international agreement can only enter into force if ratified by six of the 11 signatories: the E.U., Australia, Canada, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, the U.S. and Switzerland. However, Mexico has already rejected it and Australia and Switzerland look set to follow suit. Even Japan, where the deal was signed, is having second thoughts. Wednesday's E.U. vote is likely to further strengthen their resolve to kick it out.
Comments
Well said, Mr. Lane
Hear, hear, indeed! I've been told by the people over at InternetNZ to watch out for something that will help us voice our opposition against TPPA in a week or two. TPPA, by its nature, seems even more secretive and harder to prevent than ACTA, so let's do everything we can to spread the word to all the regular Kiwis who will be affected by it!
Posted by Bussani at 11:45:53 on July 5, 2012
Posted by Bussani at 11:45:53 on July 5, 2012
Well said, Mr. Lane
Thanks very much. To follow up on InternetNZ's plans - you can now go to http://fairplay.net.nz and get a better idea of the implications for TPPA for those of us who use the Internet... It's short, but not very sweet (and yet still recommended) reading. Worth getting angry and *doing* something about.
Posted by Dave Lane at 21:26:35 on July 15, 2012
Posted by Dave Lane at 21:26:35 on July 15, 2012
Well said, Mr. Lane
Oops - make that http://fairdeal.net.nz - my bad.
Posted by Dave Lane at 21:28:06 on July 15, 2012
Posted by Dave Lane at 21:28:06 on July 15, 2012
What he said
Hear, hear. Secret agreements in which governments relinquish sovereignty to foreign corporations? Who in their right mind would contemplate such a thing?
Posted by John Pallister at 11:00:45 on July 5, 2012
Posted by John Pallister at 11:00:45 on July 5, 2012
Short schrift
The EU has given ACTA the pummelling it so richly deserves. This should be a lesson for our negotiators (and those who are instructing them). These secret international negotiations are undemocratic and as such, unacceptable. NZ negotiators, let's apply the same approach to the blasted US "IP Chapters" (reputedly, according to various leaks of the top secret process) in the TPPA. Tell the US to pick on some other chump, preferably one their own size.
Posted by Dave Lane at 10:03:23 on July 5, 2012
Posted by Dave Lane at 10:03:23 on July 5, 2012
MOST POPULAR
Social Media @Computerworld NZ

Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.





