Feds say Megaupload user content could be deleted this week

SUBSCRIBE
Newsletter & Subscriptions Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly.
Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Newsletter & Subscriptions
Get the latest news from Computerworld delivered via email.
Sign up now
Federal prosecutors say that two companies hosting Megaupload's servers in the US could begin deleting all user from Thursday
  • Share

Federal prosecutors say that two companies hosting Megaupload's servers in the U.S. could begin deleting all user content on them as early as Thursday.

But one of the companies today denied it had access to any data on Megaupload's servers and said it has no mechanism for returning data to Megaupload's users.

The operators of Megaupload have been charged with operating a massive online piracy operation that netted them close to $175 million in revenues and caused more than $500 million in damages to legitimate copyright holders.

Megaupload.com, which was among the top 100 Internet sites when it was busted earlier this month by federal authorities, is alleged to have been used to illegally store and share movies, television programs, music and other copyrighted content.

The company itself has claimed that its site was used by millions of people to also store legitimate data including work-related documents, family photos and other personal information.

A court document filed by the US Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia on Friday noted that US law enforcement has completed its search of Megaupload's servers and copied all relevant data from them.

The servers are no longer in the custody of law enforcement and have been released back to Carpathia Hosting and Cogent Communications, the two US companies Megaupload leased its servers from.

The servers were never removed from the premises of these two companies and are currently under the control of Cogent and Carpathia, the document said. "Now that the United States has completed execution of its search warrants, the United States has no continuing right to access the Mega Servers."

Those seeking access to the data contained in those servers should contact Cogent or Carpathia directly, prosecutors noted in the letter. "It is our understanding that the hosting companies may begin deleting the contents of the servers beginning as early as February 2, 2012," it added.

If the companies do so, tens of thousands of users who used Megaupload.com to store documents, photos and videos could lose the data forever.

Carpathia Hosting today however denied that it has, or ever had, any control over Megaupload's content.

"The reference to the Feb. 2, 2012 date in the Department of Justice letter for the deletion of content is not based on any information provided by Carpathia to the U.S. Government," the company said in a statement. "We would recommend that anyone who believes that they have content on MegaUpload servers contact MegaUpload. Please do not contact Carpathia Hosting."

Cogent did not respond immediately to a request for comment.
Comments
Evidence So they are deleting the evidence even before the trial starts ? Very strange.
Posted by Neil at 10:46:45 on February 1, 2012

Flag abuse

Legit MegaUpload users So, if all the MegaUpload data gets deleted, and then after a long trial, Kim Dotcom gets off, will there be huge damages suits against the US Govt from all the affected users?
Posted by BlueShift at 9:01:46 on February 1, 2012

Flag abuse

Cloud computing so you just really totally trust having your data on the cloud now even more.
Posted by Anonymous at 14:01:48 on January 31, 2012

Flag abuse

Why aren't Cogent and Carpathia being charged? Surely these two comapnies are just as "guilty", as they have hosted the alleged "illegal content" and taken money off megaupload to do so - why are they not listed as co-conspirators?
Posted by Dom at 9:36:44 on January 31, 2012

Flag abuse

Why aren't Cogent and Carpathia being charged? Because it is as ridiculous as considering that mega-upload is responsible for the content posted by it's users. The DMCA has 'safe-harbour' provisions that I am sure Megaupload believes it also is eligible for. On top of copyright offences not even being listed in the schedule of offences eligible for extradition under our agreement with the US - meaning the insider trading and laundering charges have to stick, but I have seen that these are dependant on copyright charges... so extradition SHOULD NOT happen... this case is a farce.
Posted by anon at 9:54:48 on January 31, 2012

Flag abuse

computerworld
Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.