File-sharing Bill passed into law

SUBSCRIBE
Newsletter & Subscriptions Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly.
Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Newsletter & Subscriptions
Get the latest news from Computerworld delivered via email.
Sign up now
Controversial Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Bill passed

In a wide-ranging debate under urgency, Parliament brought the Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Bill to the brink of passage at midnight last night when the Speaker suspended debate.

The final vote this morning passed the Bill by 111 votes to 11, the same figure as at second reading.

The legislation puts in place a complex regime of warning and enforcement notices issued through internet service providers to users suspected of infringing copyright by online file-sharing, culminating in appearance of alleged repeat infringers before the Copyright Tribunal and possible further penalty in a district court.

The power to suspend a repeat offender’s internet account is held in reserve in the Bill, to be possibly activated at a future stage by an Order in Council. Some Parliamentarians responded with relief to this suspension, while others complained that it makes enforcement of the ultimate sanction less democratic than normal inclusion in a law that has gone through the full Parliamentary process.

The debate brought frequent reference, particularly by Labour ICT spokeswoman Clare Curran, to the uncomfortable compromise of including but reserving the suspension power, which had finally ensured the votes of the Labour party.

Members repeated much material familiar to anyone who has been following the progress of the Bill and the previous ill-fated Section 92A of the Copyright Bill; including reference to internet access as a human right and characterisation of the disconnection penalty as no worse than a driving ban; there were even the obligatory comparisons of the internet to the Wild West.

On the more forward-looking side, Green MP Gareth Hughes contended that what is needed is a complete re-examination of the working of Copyright in an age of rapidly advancing digital technology.

The spectre of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) free trade agreement was raised by several Opposition MPs. The US entertainment industry is pushing for a further extension on copyright terms and re-examination of ISP liability for customer breach of copyright, according to leaked TPP negotiation papers and Opposition MPs raised fears that the agreement reached on the file-sharing Bill may be a temporary and hollow victory.

Commerce Minister Simon Power’s amendment clarifying the burden of proof in connection with an accusation of infringement was accepted into the Bill.
Comments
i love downloading old movies i have been downloading old movies (not torrent sites) but how would you know if its illegal/legal because thwy all have privacy warning on their websites.
Posted by Anonymous at 1:45:29 on April 29, 2011

Flag abuse

Film, Music, Copyright Industry and the politicians?? Getting closer to retirement age, I am getting more and more sceptical of any abilities of politicians, music industry hoods (sorry heads), and and financially 'broke' film industrialists. So many have abused others in their quest for superiority in the businesses associated with copyright, it is no wonder we now end up with so many desparate inadequate measures and regulations. So many failed to adjust quickly enough with the real world involving digital technology and now we are all expected to pay. Dog eat dog world out there. Do we still have enough terriers to take on these old "Rott"weilers.
Posted by Frank May at 5:50:17 on April 16, 2011

Flag abuse

It's a much larger issue It's a much larger issue than just breach of copyright. This law is the first in this country which puts the onus on the acusee to prove their innocence. This is the direct opposite of how every other law in this country, and the rest of the world, is; innocent until proven guilty. Make no mistake this opens the door for the big companies who want to pursue copyright infringers to just go for it.
There are so many concerning things with the fact that the bill has been passed into law that I am seriously questioning this countries democratic process.
Posted by Musings at 12:02:29 on April 15, 2011

Flag abuse

Don't knock the politicians After all, they are the very best that money can buy.
Posted by Anonymous at 10:24:17 on April 15, 2011

Flag abuse

Copyright Illegal downloading is theft. Plain and simple, no ifs, no buts, it's theft. Why do you think its called illegal downloading?
Posted by Anonymous at 19:27:56 on April 14, 2011

Flag abuse

Copyright I suggest you look up the definition of "theft" in the Crimes Act (Section 219); it means dealing dishonestly with property with intent "to deprive any owner permanently of that property".

If I copy a file from you, have I deprived you of it?

I'm not arguing that breach of copyright is not wrong or illegal; but it's a civil wrong - a breach of the Copyright Act and nothing else.

It is not theft; it is not (in a strict legal sense) a crime and it does not merit the scale of punishment due to crimes, such as the removal of the fundamental liberty to "seek, receive, and impart information and opinions of any kind in any form" (NZ Bill of Rights Act, Section 14)

Posted by Irv Ogby at 4:55:16 on April 15, 2011

Flag abuse

Copyright Because it's not legal, but murder is also illegal, based on that analogy is murder, theft?
Posted by Anonymous at 22:15:13 on April 14, 2011

Flag abuse

bureaucratic bungling Typical! Pass it at midnight when hardly anyone is around, and under urgency (What?!! .. what's urgent about this bit of neo fascism anyway?)

The (so called) gov't should be concentrating on the really urgent stuff, like the global environment etc., it won't matter one jot about who shares files when what we need to do is learn to share our world, for our own preservation. Absolutely.
Posted by Octopus at 17:21:04 on April 14, 2011

Flag abuse

Bill is stupid Seriously passing this is a waste of time, only mums and dads type families are going to get caught because they use public tool to download such as limewire and public torrents. Anyone with half a clue know that it's all about underground and private scenes.

The reason this is true is because the companies that RIAA etc hire to do their copyright scanning only hit the blatnetly obvious public download sites........ they won't be targeting private ones that require trust to join into.......

Fail!
Posted by Anon at 15:44:43 on April 14, 2011

Flag abuse

Bill is stupid Not to mention. I have a small server running in somewhere. Who knows where it's physically located. Probably the US. Costs a few bucks a week. No bandwidth limits. Guess I could just install utorrent on that and VPN into it from here. Problem solved.
Posted by Anonymous at 17:33:31 on April 15, 2011

Flag abuse

computerworld
Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.