Govt-Microsoft panel aims at more consistency, less cost

SUBSCRIBE
Newsletter & Subscriptions Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly.
Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Newsletter & Subscriptions
Get the latest news from Computerworld delivered via email.
Sign up now
Five service providers appointed to syndicated panel

The Department of Internal Affairs has set up a panel of five service providers for licence administration and management services in connection with government agencies’ purchase of Microsoft products and services.

This latest all-of-government ICT initiative aims at achieving a more consistent framework for dealing with Microsoft. The syndicated services panel will also “reduce the cost of purchasing licences, remove duplication and streamline the procurement process”, says Internal Affairs Minister Chris Tremain.

Government reached a purchasing arrangement with Microsoft earlier this year – known as the G2012 framework - as part of its usual three-yearly cycle; this was said to have the potential to save 55 percent of the cost of Microsoft goods and services for most government agencies.

However, the actual arrangement of purchases has been done until now through a variety of “large account resellers” (LARs). Agencies have chosen for themselves which LAR they used. This has resulted in “inconsistency in service levels and fees charged by the LARs”, Tremain says.

The service providers appointed to the syndicated panel are Datacom, Dimension Data, Fujitsu, Gen-i and Insight. All participants in the G2012 framework will have access to the new LAR arrangement.

The panel arrangement, like others for the supply of products and services, is designed to encourage government agencies to adopt shared approaches and solutions, Tremain says. Agencies will not be obliged to deal with a member of the panel, but “I strongly encourage all government agencies to find out how the panel can help save them time and money,” Tremain says.

A set of “basic LAR services” has been agreed. These are the core services that are required to acquire and administer Microsoft licenses and related agreements

Each panellist has proposed a set of additional services that it could provide related to its role as a Microsoft LAR. These will be finalised for each of the suppliers over the next few months, says DIA.
Comments
Money for jam I bet the MS guys are getting an hourly rate for sitting on the panel.
Posted by Anonymous at 17:47:58 on November 13, 2012

Flag abuse

Money for jam And I bet you're rocking your tall poppy chopping comment bashing for free.

Get a job.
Posted by Anonymous at 9:29:02 on November 14, 2012

Flag abuse

Money for jam The panel is made up of ICT Provider companies, not people! And certainly not Microsoft, they are the supplier of goods into the panel.
Posted by Anonymous at 13:46:16 on November 17, 2012

Flag abuse

meh Same old Government, they won't learn from their own failures.

Balance of trade doesn't get changed by swapping Pacific Pesos around within your own country.

It might make a difference if the NZ Government invested in local software developers who could export products they develop overseas. But that would require the type of foresight not found in Government.
Posted by Same old Government at 15:53:22 on November 13, 2012

Flag abuse

meh I'm struggling to find any NZ development houses writing OS's, or equivalents for Sharepoint, Exchange, Word, Excel, Access, Powerpoint or the myriad of network, management or cloud applications and tools.

Don't know what planet you're from, but you should have bought a return ticket!
Posted by Anonymous at 10:19:06 on November 14, 2012

Flag abuse

Any LARs not on the list? So, yet another expensive DIA selection process that results in a panel of everyone. Looks good on paper (and in an article where the journalist doesn't take time to think)
Posted by Anonymous at 14:46:08 on November 13, 2012

Flag abuse

Any LARs not on the list? It's DIA isn't it... Possibly one of the slowest, most archaic, govt departments in existence.
Posted by Anonymous at 14:50:48 on November 13, 2012

Flag abuse

Any LARs not on the list? Agreed. This was a useless waste of time for both DIA and LARs, with the end result being confirmation of the status quo. All the current 5 LARs are on the "panel" so no "selection" was made. They will continue to resell Microsoft licenses exactly as they have always done, some well, some badly. How Chris Tremain can claim this as a success beats me!
Posted by Anonymous at 13:37:19 on November 17, 2012

Flag abuse

There's another word for this It's called a "cartel." Rorting the taxpayers again to pay for insecure closed shite.
Posted by Anonymous at 21:03:07 on November 12, 2012

Flag abuse

There's another word for this Its not a cartel, and the govt doesn't control this - Microsoft select only some companies to act as approved resellers and everyone in the market has to use them. Same for most other products, especially IT products, eg: you can't buy Apple products from just anyone.
Posted by Anonymous at 13:42:57 on November 17, 2012

Flag abuse

computerworld
Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.