Huawei banned from Australian govt’s NBN
LATEST NEWS
SUBSCRIBE
Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly. Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
UPDATED: ICT Minister Amy Adams comments. Chinese telco equipment manufacturer has been asked not to participate in tender for the Australian National Broadband Network
By Sim Ahmed | Auckland | Monday, 26 March, 2012 | 9 Comments
The Australian government has banned Chinese telecommunications equipment manufacturer Huawei from tending bids for its multi-billion dollar National Broadband Network (NBN) project, saying it risks the integrity of the network.
Australian media are reporting the ban is due to concerns over cyber attacks originating in China, and Huawei’s CEO’s alleged links to the Chinese People's Liberation Army.
"As a strategic and significant government investment, we have a responsibility to do our utmost to protect [the NBN's] integrity and that of the information carried on it," a spokeswoman for Australia's Attorney General, Nicola Roxon, told the Australian Financial Review.
"This is consistent with the government's practice for ensuring the security and resilience of Australia's critical infrastructure more broadly."
Earlier this month, top executives from Huawei’s headquarters came to New Zealand to assess potential business opportunities in the country.
UPDATE: A spokesperson for Huawei New Zealand says the decision in Australia will have no affect on its role in supplying UFB components in New Zealand.
"The decision in Australia has no relevance to us. We're the vendor for around a third of the UFB rollout," says Mark Champion, public affairs manager at Huawei New Zealand.
“We’ve reached a point where they [wholesale providers] are comfortable with the contracts and aspects around this.”
In 2007, Huawei won the tender for Vodafone’s fixed line broadband network, and the following year began working with 2degrees to build and launch its cellular network.
Huawei also supplies fibre infrastructure products to two Local Fibre Companies rolling out the government-backed Ultra Fast Broadband network - Ultra Fast Broadband Ltd, and Enable.
ICT Minister, Amy Adams, refused to comment on Huawei specifically, but says network security is taken seriously by her ministry.
“The Government will work with all suppliers and operators to address any security concerns that may be identified, and is committed to working with operators and suppliers to protect the integrity and confidentiality of the UFB and RBI network,” says Adams.
Computerworld has approached Huawei's New Zealand partners Chorus, Enable, and Ultra Fast Broadband Ltd for comment.
UPDATE: at 1:00pm
Enable, Crown Fibre’s partner for the UFB rollout in Christchurch, says it consulted with the government before entering into a partnership with Huawei to purchase network equipment including fibre ducting, fibre optic cables, and open access layer 2 network solutions.
“We consulted New Zealand government security agencies through the selection process and have complied with agency requirements, ”says Malcom Campbell , general manager of sales.
“We have confidence in Huawei as our partner on the basis of its proven reputation as one of the world’s biggest providers of telecommunication infrastructure solutions,” he says.
UPDATE: at 3:30pm
Chorus says it has consulted with government agencies, and is not worried that Huawei poses a security threat to its UFB roll out.
“We work closely with the MED [Ministry of Economic Development] on cyber security policy in addition to our own rigourous standards,” says a spokesperson for Chorus.
“Chorus will only work with suppliers and operators that can meet our rigorous network security requirements.”
Chorus is reviewing options for its layer 2 infrastructure and could see that technology supplied by Huawei in the future.
Last year the company signed a deal with Huawei to purchase coarse wavelength division multiplexing (CWDM) equipment which is used in the rural broadband initiative (RBI).
Ultra Fast Broadband Ltd has refused to comment.
Comments
Xenophobic Australians
the Australian public will accept this because they've proven over the years to be very xenophobic.
Posted by Glenn at 10:39:08 on March 27, 2012
Posted by Glenn at 10:39:08 on March 27, 2012
sounds very much like ..
sounds very much like the US govt putting pressure on the Aust govt to pick US manufacturers particularly given the US-Aust FTA.
It's all BS.
The US are running scared of the Chinese economy becoming a (even more) dominant world player.
Posted by Glenn at 10:35:26 on March 27, 2012
It's all BS.
The US are running scared of the Chinese economy becoming a (even more) dominant world player.
Posted by Glenn at 10:35:26 on March 27, 2012
Tracked!
I new it, i am pretty sure they have installed GPS type tracking chips in my shirts, shorts, and jandals i'm wearing. After all these are all made in China.
Posted by Cloudy computing at 16:27:19 on March 26, 2012
Posted by Cloudy computing at 16:27:19 on March 26, 2012
Security theatre
Is this the type of thinking that has got the ANZ bank ATM's hacked? - So the end points are probably from China, be they PC's or Phones or TV's - the routers and switches in the homes or at the edge are probably from China, more than likely any other "brand" has it's equipment or the components used in them sourced from China - Hmmm so much for network security - it's already compromised folks. Perhaps the Australians (and I'm sure they actually do) should think about security at a slightly higher "layer" than this.
Posted by John Harrop at 11:47:16 on March 26, 2012
Posted by John Harrop at 11:47:16 on March 26, 2012
Backward move
Ridiculous move by the Australian govt, politically motivated and sets Aussie-Chinese relations back decades.
If it was a government or secure network perhaps I could understand but a public network. There are different ways to mitigate any risk,perceived or otherwise.
As a previous poster alludes who says IBM, Cisco, Juniper or any other network companies are any less complicit with the military, especially in their R&D programmes.
Posted by henareho at 11:36:57 on March 26, 2012
If it was a government or secure network perhaps I could understand but a public network. There are different ways to mitigate any risk,perceived or otherwise.
As a previous poster alludes who says IBM, Cisco, Juniper or any other network companies are any less complicit with the military, especially in their R&D programmes.
Posted by henareho at 11:36:57 on March 26, 2012
Security in government
Amy Adams commenting on network security - it i doubtful if her Ministry can even spell security never mind understand it! There is a complete absence of sensible decisions about security in NZ government (and others). Risk based decision making is just a method of not dealing the with unpalatable and hard decisions around security.
Good on the Aussies for at least admitting the truth. The elephant in the room may not be pleasant but it is really there. About time we stopped being so PC and look at our needs and interests first.
Posted by Anonymous at 11:28:23 on March 26, 2012
Good on the Aussies for at least admitting the truth. The elephant in the room may not be pleasant but it is really there. About time we stopped being so PC and look at our needs and interests first.
Posted by Anonymous at 11:28:23 on March 26, 2012
Politics
There are no reputable research out there that says Cisco, HP, Juniper technology have more "integrity" than manufacturer XYZ.
Using a vendor X does not mean you get less "attacks" coming from China. How does it even relate?
Posted by Anonymous at 10:00:39 on March 26, 2012
Using a vendor X does not mean you get less "attacks" coming from China. How does it even relate?
Posted by Anonymous at 10:00:39 on March 26, 2012
Because the alternatives are SOOO much better!
Far better to get in to bed with a country where private interests can buy the government and then influence their trading partners to arrange bogus extraditions! No country is squeeky clean, and I'm sure this will do nothing to improve Australias relationship with the worlds largest emerging economy!
Posted by Anonymous at 9:53:54 on March 26, 2012
Posted by Anonymous at 9:53:54 on March 26, 2012
Ban would be illegal in NZ?
Given we have a FTA with China, this type of ban could not be imposed.
Posted by Anonymous at 9:35:24 on March 26, 2012
Posted by Anonymous at 9:35:24 on March 26, 2012
MOST POPULAR
Social Media @Computerworld NZ

Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.





