IBM joins govt’s Infrastructure as a Service panel

SUBSCRIBE
Newsletter & Subscriptions Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly.
Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Newsletter & Subscriptions
Get the latest news from Computerworld delivered via email.
Sign up now
Internal affairs minister Chris Tremain says IaaS deal will save up to $250m over the next ten years

The Department of Internal Affairs has confirmed IBM as the third member of the government’s Infrastructure as a Service supplier panel.

IBM joins Datacom and Revera Ltd who were awarded contracts in October 2011.

Government agencies wishing to use the IaaS model for accessing ICT services now have a choice of three pre-approved suppliers, rather than having to go through a competitive tendering exercise.

The DIA confirmed at the time of the other two suppliers’ appointment that IBM was still in the running. The delay led to suspicion that it was taking longer to tie IBM down to a deal government would accept.

“This is simply a reflection of IBM’s governance structure and accountabilities,” Brent Chalmers, then general manager of the government ICT supply management office (Gismo) at the department, said at the time. “This is not atypical for multinational corporations.”

Asked again today why the decision to appoint IBM to the panel took more than six months longer than that for the local suppliers, spokespeople for DIA plead “commercial sensitivity” and declined to comment.

By allowing government agencies to purchase access to ICT infrastructure as and when needed, rather than lay out large capital expenditure on ICT equipment in advance to cater for future growth, the IaaS deal “will save taxpayers up to $250 million over the next ten years,” says Internal Affairs Minister Chris Tremain.

“The launch of the Infrastructure as a Service panel is an important part of the Government’s aim to reduce the cost of ICT and improve public customer services,” Tremain adds.
Comments
Depressing All the IT workers in Wellington on here again showing their professionalism. Depressing.
Posted by Marvin at 8:23:58 on June 6, 2012

Flag abuse

Disapointing Choice If for no other reason (and there are plenty of others) than it took 6 months longer than the other providers to strike a deal because of it being a "reflection of IBM's governance structure and accountabilities" that sounds like the innovative, agile provider to move the country or your business forward. One where it takes 6 months of bureaucracy to do a deal others already did that really sounds like the agility the cloud offers. DIA should have said take it or leave it back then, knowing how empty the current datacentre is they would have more than likely taken it.
Posted by Anonymous at 23:43:41 on June 5, 2012

Flag abuse

6m longer It's exactly the time IBM needs to run anything past the US legal team.

I don't understand how NZ govt can do this with the Patriot Act still being active. It's like giving the US full access to whatever is on there. This is the main reason NZ providers are preferred.

So why are they in on the deal? It's not like IBM can unhinge US law.
Posted by Anonymous at 15:58:21 on June 5, 2012

Flag abuse

6m longer patriot act has nothing to do with this.
Posted by Anonymous at 17:29:46 on June 5, 2012

Flag abuse

6m longer Certainly a consideration for buyers... that is unless it isn't real IaaS IBM is offering....
Posted by Anonymous at 23:37:23 on June 5, 2012

Flag abuse

6m longer wrong, it is a local offering in a local DC, again the patriot act has nothing to do with this conversation.
Posted by Anonymous at 8:48:44 on June 6, 2012

Flag abuse

6m longer Wrong again - Patriot act applies to hardware ownership
Posted by Anonymous at 16:30:29 on June 7, 2012

Flag abuse

GCSB Waihopai will also become kind of redundant; with a US company looking after NZ Government data on US-owned hard drives, they won't need ECHELON running down here to intercept it any more.
Posted by Shax at 19:31:38 on June 2, 2012

Flag abuse

Thank goodness for that! I was worried the government has lost it's way with this project; but now they've appointed a bloated American corporation who will send profits and jobs off-shore, I can rest easy again, knowing that the right anonymous donations were made.
Posted by Shax at 19:25:43 on June 2, 2012

Flag abuse

Thank goodness for that! So what rock you been hiding under... IBM NZ is no different from the other three, they all offer the same to the NZ market in differing degrees. Where do you think they all buy there hardware from.. There sure as eggs is no NZ manufacturer for IT hardware it is all imported from LARGE global companies. IBM has invested more in NZ that the other two put together with multiple Data centers a large local staff present that all pay TAX in NZ and many that own shares in IBM.
While IBM is not a perfect company, please show me one that is..!! You also need to ask the question why have the other two not signed ANY business as they were on-boarded months ago. Sub standard solutions maybe....
Posted by SNMP at 9:52:24 on June 5, 2012

Flag abuse

computerworld
Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.