'It wasn’t enough on the day': Sam Morgan

SUBSCRIBE
Newsletter & Subscriptions Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly.
Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Newsletter & Subscriptions
Get the latest news from Computerworld delivered via email.
Sign up now
Pacific Fibre chair says finance couldn’t be raised, despite $200m in pre-sales

Despite gaining US$200million in pre-sales, Pacific Fibre could not raise enough finance to build an international cable connecting New Zealand to the US and Australia.

“It wasn’t enough on the day, as they say in rugby,” says chairman Sam Morgan.

The proposed submarine cable connecting Australia, New Zealand and the United States has failed because of a lack of funding. The idea to build a $400 million project was first launched in March 2010, with the ambitious goal of going live in 2013.

Morgan says he and other shareholders – which include Stephen Tindall, Rod Drury and Facebook investor Peter Thiel – have collectively spent around $6 million on Pacific Fibre. But, after failing to secure the additional finance, Morgan announced today that Pacific Fibre has ceased operations.

“We didn’t find much (funding) out of New Zealand, so it was a global search but it was hard to talk to people in other parts of the world about investing in a fibre optic cable connecting Australia, New Zealand the US,” says Morgan.

This was despite achieving US$200 million in pre-sales from companies that expressed interest in using the cable, most notably the $91 million contract with REANNZ and an additional contract with Vodafone.

“We have more pre-sales than in the history of the planet,” says Morgan. “We don’t really think it was an issue of adequacy of customer contracts.”

When asked if the government should have contributed money, Morgan replied: “There are lots of people who would like to have the government sort out their problems and we don’t tend to be those sorts of people.”

Morgan says the demand for faster, cost-effective international connectivity will grow with the rollout of the Ultra Fast Broadband.

“We started the project in the first place because we are strongly of the view that Ultra Fast Broadband itself will not achieve the economic objectives the government has sought,” Morgan says. “So we put our hand up and we had a go at trying to solve the other part, which really is a market failure, which is a monopoly/single supplier [Southern Cross Cable] otherwise.”

When the project was first announced Pacific Fibre spoke to State Owned Enterprise Kordia about a possible collaboration, but Morgan says the two companies had differing views. Kordia’s project, called Optikor, was a trans-Tasman cable, but Morgan says that Pacific Fibre was always focused on connecting to the US.

“There’s no business case for going to Australia because all the content that New Zealanders want to consume is in the US,” says Morgan. “So what that means is that you then have to buy connectivity from Australia to the US, which is further away from the US then NZ is, and you’d be subject to the pricing which is set by a duopoly on that leg. So you would still be paying Southern Cross, or Telstra to get to the content that you want.”

Kordia announced in January that Axin and Huawei Marine (two Chinese-owned technology companies) are now leading the Optikor project.

So what will Pacific Fibre do with its intellectual property, given that it was still working on technical specifications for the project up until last week?

“We’ve go a lot that we can now put in a box and place on a shelf and if anyone else is wanting to look at doing this sort of project, we’d be happy to share what we’ve learnt. It’s of very little use to us at this point,” says Morgan.

Pacific Fibre employed six people, including CEO Mark Rushworth, who also invested in the project. Morgan says the directors will use their networks to help the employees find new jobs.
Comments
Southern Cross It's a pity it's hit the buffers, but not all that surprising. In my past career I've been heavily involved in these types of projects, mostly trans-Atlantic.
I used to bump into Southern Cross folks when they were doing the rounds at industry events in Europe and the US and were out marketing their plans for the system. I remember thinking that, unlike most other systems, they were engineering it properly; latest upgradeable capacity technology, but crucially a huge figure-8 arrangement, so that if one section failed the system can just re-route automatically over another section. This makes a massive difference as when these cables go down, and they sometimes do due to fishing activity, ships dragging their anchors etc, they are down for typically a week minimum, until you can get a ship out to repair them.
Right from the start with Pacific Fibre, as a single cable, I always wondered what the story was on this. After all, whose traffic is unimportant enough that they can do without it for a week? The answer I always heard was that customers would buy capacity on other systems to protect against this, but that would then put it at a significant disadvantage against Southern Cross.
Kiwis - instead of rubbishing good old Telecom and its Southern Cross cable, why don't you recognise it for what it was (and is), a bold investment decision and a stunning technological achievement that was ten years ahead of its time, and still sees off the competition all these years later?
Posted by A Pom in Wellington at 21:07:16 on August 1, 2012

Flag abuse

Southern Cross Like you, I have been involved in these projects, for years - but you miss the point. Ask yourself, when was the Trans-oceanic last ring system built? PC1 across the Pacific abd S-X back in 2000 (or so). Ring systems are no longer constructed anywhere, even in high risk shallow water areas such as SE Asia. (last 3 there are linear, despite previous to that multiple ring systems constructed). The industry now collaborates by swapping capacity or purchasing diversity to lower initial capex and constructing linear systems.

S-X is a good system, (but drop the hyperbole - certainly not 10 years ahead of its time!) but it is old in terms of these systems and does have limited up gradeability. If you claim to know this industry, you will know cables are not constructed because of a lack of capacity. Look at the Atlantic right now.
Posted by overseas knowledge at 14:32:20 on August 2, 2012

Flag abuse

Southern Cross In the examples of routes you mention the addressable markets at each end are orders of magnitude larger than Australasia so multiple system can make a go of it economically and generally over shorter distances with lower construction costs. Southern Cross' backers gambled it could raise enough sales to support the construction of a resileint design and then pre-sold capacity to anyone with a pulse thereby breaking the old carrier club dominated by Telstra. On long routes between thin markets the second guy is always going to struggle without an imaginative business model and risk sharing proposal potentially with the first guy.
Posted by Anonymous at 20:35:24 on August 2, 2012

Flag abuse

A set back but we shouldn't all slit our wrists Telecom has had a dream run with Southern Cross but they made it clear that the reason for building was because Telstra was wanting to control all of Australasia international connections - it was a lifeline issue not an investment. Folk like Rod Snodgrass and other senior managers there know it cannot continue forever. So while some groups/individuals will now see another trans tasman cable as a stop gap (but probably uneconomic) maybe the Pacific Fibre backers and others should have another chat with Telecom etc about the future possibilities. Telecom is now a service provider more than an infrastructure company - that's Chorus' game, so it doesn't need infrastructure grief in the future either.
Posted by Mangawhai at 20:10:13 on August 1, 2012

Flag abuse

No business case for trans-tasman? So Sam is saying there IS a business case for transit to the US??? If so, wouldn't the investors be flocking and the press release would read somewhat differently? The facts are that there is no link between the fundamental commercials of the project and the fundamental need of the country. A little like UFB, it requires government underwriting, because the business case doesn't stack up on its own. Even the enormous egos involved in PacFibre could not make this a saleable proposition.
Posted by Love the spin... at 18:19:15 on August 1, 2012

Flag abuse

Case for govt intervention In many other countries, the governments have understood their responsibility for building a proper infrastructure. Without a second cable NZ is going to fall even further behind - a far cry from 15 years ago when we were talking up being at the 'forefront of the knowledge economy'. What a joke this country is. I can get a faster connection in Vietnam. Back to farming everyone!


Posted by Chris s at 17:28:08 on August 1, 2012

Flag abuse

pacific fibre massive pity, massive loss, I'm as bit lost for words here, Not only was it left to a small group of net philanthopists to get the dam road fixed, now we drive around on motorways ( Fibre) but the airport only has a cesna ( current overseas bandwith)

someone needs to sort this out, these guys had foresight, no wonder hindsight is a bitch
Posted by Anonymous at 16:58:01 on August 1, 2012

Flag abuse

pacific fibre Philanthropists ... you have to be kidding
Listen to Rod Drury on NewsTalk ZB
Posted by Allan at 17:41:49 on August 1, 2012

Flag abuse

cash was only one of the issues The massive gorilla in the room was access into the US all the talk and hype didn't change that. Landing a cable into California is next to impossible and little old NZ has no push in that que!
Great that you gave it a go, but I can't help wondering if you scared Kordia off and now have folded as it just wasn't as easy as you tried to make it look.

Posted by more too this at 16:30:47 on August 1, 2012

Flag abuse

cash was only one of the issues You are very misinformed - landing a cable in California is not impossible - having done 4 myself, the last only 3 years ago
Posted by Anonymous at 17:25:13 on August 1, 2012

Flag abuse

Sustainable 60 2013

computerworld
Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.