Joyce backs down - the regulatory holiday is gone
LATEST NEWS
- NZ game industry: Indie game development is bad for your health
- NZ game industry: Govt support for development increasing
- Telecom opens pre-orders for Samsung Galaxy S III || 4
- Video, connection costs major factors in broadband uptake: ComCom
- No more risk to privacy on Facebook, than web: MED
- Raspberry Pi arrives in New Zealand || 4
SUBSCRIBE
Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly. Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
The controversial regulatory forbearance period is to be removed from the Telecommunications Amendment Bill
By Computerworld staff | Auckland | Wednesday, 18 May, 2011 | 12 Comments
The regulatory forbearance period that would have prevented Commerce Commission oversight into wholesale pricing on the Ultra Fast Broadband network until 2020 has been removed.
ICT Minister Steven Joyce has released a statement saying that regulatory forbearance will be replaced with contractual mechanisms.
“Regulatory forbearance on wholesale prices for the ultra-fast broadband network will be replaced with contractual mechanisms that would apply if the Commerce Commission regulates prices lower than those contracted,” he says.
Joyce says the move is in response to industry concerns.
The so-called regulatory holiday was to have been enshrined in the Telecommunications Amendment Bill. On Monday the finance and expenditure select committee recommended by a majority decision that the Bill be passed with a few changes. The Act, Labour and Green parties all produced minority reports slamming the regulatory forbearance period and there has been fierce industry opposition to the move.
Here is the Minister’s statement in full:
Regulatory forbearance on wholesale prices for the ultra-fast broadband network will be replaced with contractual mechanisms that would apply if the Commerce Commission regulates prices lower than those contracted, Communications and Information Technology Minister Steven Joyce announced today.
In announcing the move, Mr Joyce says that he had listened carefully to industry concerns in regards to the plan for regulatory forbearance over the 8 ½ year build period of the contract.
“While I think their concerns are more theoretical than real, given that pretty much everybody has been happy with the very competitive prices announced by CFH to date, we have been able to find an alternative solution which will give the infrastructure builders confidence to stay committed to their low capped prices, and customers confidence that they are will continue to get the best prices over that 8½ year period.”
Mr Joyce said investors contractual mechanisms would be triggered if significant changes are made to price or other key features of the UFB regime over the build period.
“Any such remedies would remain within the current government funding of $1.35 Billion. They could be in the form of additional deferred repayment to the government of the funding. These remedies are similar to those provided in other public-private partnerships.
“In making this change the government is backing the prices negotiated by CFH, however, if the Commerce Commission believes prices should go lower at some point over the build period, government wears the risk not consumers.
The contractual mechanisms would not apply where there was behaviour by Local Fibre Companies which resulted in regulatory change.
The Government will also include an “avoidance of doubt” clause in the purpose statement of the Telecommunications Act 2001, and write a Government Policy Statement, which together will make it more explicit that the Commerce Commission and the Minister must consider investment and innovation in new markets when considering price regulation.
Mr Joyce says amendments to remove regulatory forbearance from the Telecommunications Amendment Bill and make the related changes will be introduced at the final legislative stages of the bill.
While the Commerce Commission’s normal role under the proposed Act will now apply, the restriction on unbundling of the UFB network to residential customers will remain until 1 January 2020, after which unbundling can occur.
The Minister thanked the Maori Party for their representations and assistance in developing the change.
"The Maori Party has taken a consistently positive view of the importance of Ultra-fast Broadband and the Rural Broadband initiative in lifting economic development for Maori and all New Zealanders. They are taking a constructive approach to what will be a transforming investment for New Zealand.
“I also welcome the Finance and Expenditure Committee’s amendment to bring the general review of the telecommunications regime forward to 2016 to provide earlier certainty about the form of regulatory regime that may replace the current one.
“This package of measures together will provide additional certainty for bidders but also retain additional aspects of the current telecommunications regime that some stakeholders have been concerned about changing,” says Mr Joyce.
Comments
Wearing the risk
"government wears the risk not consumers"
Remind me again where the government gets its money from?
I thought we were trying to cut back on govt spending? Why shouldn't the consumers foot the bill for the product they are consuming?
Posted by BlueShift at 10:40:47 on May 18, 2011
Remind me again where the government gets its money from?
I thought we were trying to cut back on govt spending? Why shouldn't the consumers foot the bill for the product they are consuming?
Posted by BlueShift at 10:40:47 on May 18, 2011
Wearing the risk
The Minister made it quite clear that any costs of the contractual mechanism that replaces the regulatory holiday will come out of the $1.35Bn. So there is no more money being spent should ComCom regulate prices lower. It does however mean that less fibre will be laid as a consequence.
This is about the government guaranteeing the UFB winner (Telecom?) a sufficient return on its investment. Either the money is spent upfront (as a subsidy for capital) or the money is spent later to offer lower revenues.
Posted by Rural Connect at 12:07:47 on May 18, 2011
This is about the government guaranteeing the UFB winner (Telecom?) a sufficient return on its investment. Either the money is spent upfront (as a subsidy for capital) or the money is spent later to offer lower revenues.
Posted by Rural Connect at 12:07:47 on May 18, 2011
Wearing the risk
should have read "... to offset lower revenues"
Posted by Rural Connect at 12:09:02 on May 18, 2011
Posted by Rural Connect at 12:09:02 on May 18, 2011
Wearing the risk
Privatise the profits, socialise the losses...
Posted by BlueShift at 12:33:24 on May 18, 2011
Posted by BlueShift at 12:33:24 on May 18, 2011
Wearing the risk
Consumers WILL be "footing the bill for the product they are consuming" as you say, IN ADDITION TO coughing up the shortfalls for the bill at the same time with taxes...
Posted by Anonymous at 10:47:59 on May 18, 2011
Posted by Anonymous at 10:47:59 on May 18, 2011
Prediction: Telecom has won the UFB
Mr Joyce's announcement this morning about the change to the regulatory holiday provisions is a fair compromise.
His press release confirms that the regulatory holiday was about maintaining a higher wholesale price. It also confirms that it was about ensuring CFH and the UFB winners having a guaranteed return on investment. The new provisions now build that guarantee in to the contractual arrangements with CFH.
If ComCom believes that prices should go lower, and regulates for that, then as Mr Joyce says, "the government wears the risk, not consumers". Which means that the government will pay to maintain the investors' return on investment. That may be okay because the alternative was that the government pay this upfront through a higher UFB subsidy. The money would come from the $1.35Bn UFB budget.
If Telecom win the UFB bid, then that guarantee will likely be triggered because the artificially high wholesale price opens a door to competition.
If the lines companies win the UFB bid, then the guarantee is irrelevant because the wholesale price will have to drop to match Telecom's certain competition via their FttN plus DSL service.
The Minister's change overcomes the investment uncertainty aspect introduced by Labour's announcement that it would repeal the legislation. In lending more support to Telecom, Mr Joyce has therefore signaled that Telecom has already won the bidding.
Posted by Rural Connect at 9:58:57 on May 18, 2011
His press release confirms that the regulatory holiday was about maintaining a higher wholesale price. It also confirms that it was about ensuring CFH and the UFB winners having a guaranteed return on investment. The new provisions now build that guarantee in to the contractual arrangements with CFH.
If ComCom believes that prices should go lower, and regulates for that, then as Mr Joyce says, "the government wears the risk, not consumers". Which means that the government will pay to maintain the investors' return on investment. That may be okay because the alternative was that the government pay this upfront through a higher UFB subsidy. The money would come from the $1.35Bn UFB budget.
If Telecom win the UFB bid, then that guarantee will likely be triggered because the artificially high wholesale price opens a door to competition.
If the lines companies win the UFB bid, then the guarantee is irrelevant because the wholesale price will have to drop to match Telecom's certain competition via their FttN plus DSL service.
The Minister's change overcomes the investment uncertainty aspect introduced by Labour's announcement that it would repeal the legislation. In lending more support to Telecom, Mr Joyce has therefore signaled that Telecom has already won the bidding.
Posted by Rural Connect at 9:58:57 on May 18, 2011
time to reJoyce
Thank you Maori party and Act for having the guts to stand up to these corporate and political bullies. The history of Telcommunications in NZ is littered with acts that would have people in jail in other countriesa as a long term industry insider i have seen all sides of the arguments. What has been clear is that the real losers are the public via the services and price levels we are forced to pay. The Com Com is finally starting to do its job we can happy that this bill will not pass.
Posted by Ian at 9:39:34 on May 18, 2011
Posted by Ian at 9:39:34 on May 18, 2011
Well done TelstraClear
As confusing and totally inaccurate as your TV campaign has been it has added to the pressure and Joyce it would seem has seen a pragmatic solution to the conundrum of delivering certainty for LFC investors and avoiding the perception of going back to the good old unregulated monopoly days.
I look forward to your press statement claiming victory and sincerely hope you now focus on playing the game and not the officials :-)
Posted by Bugs Bunny at 9:28:12 on May 18, 2011
I look forward to your press statement claiming victory and sincerely hope you now focus on playing the game and not the officials :-)
Posted by Bugs Bunny at 9:28:12 on May 18, 2011
Well done TelstraClear
I've always thought that Alan Freeth was right and the rest of the world wrong
There is one question left for him though: when is he going to offer wholesale (open) access on his HFC networks?
Posted by Peter Rabbit at 9:31:50 on May 18, 2011
There is one question left for him though: when is he going to offer wholesale (open) access on his HFC networks?
Posted by Peter Rabbit at 9:31:50 on May 18, 2011
Well done TelstraClear
They are not taking a shed load of public cash....
Posted by ionsier receive at 9:42:41 on May 18, 2011
Posted by ionsier receive at 9:42:41 on May 18, 2011
MOST POPULAR
- NZ game industry: Govt support for development increasing
- Video, connection costs major factors in broadband uptake: ComCom
- Raspberry Pi arrives in New Zealand
- Chorus extends introductory fibre trial for RSPs until December
- IBM boosts returns to parent company, paying $20m to US
- Air NZ completes migration
Social Media @Computerworld NZ

Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.






