Maclean Computing’s unsecured creditors unlikely to be paid

SUBSCRIBE
Newsletter & Subscriptions Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly.
Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Newsletter & Subscriptions
Get the latest news from Computerworld delivered via email.
Sign up now
But staff to be paid in full by end of week says liquidator

Defeat hung in the air at the end of the creditors' meeting for the failed Maclean Computing Limited (MCL) yesterday. Damien Grant, liquidator at Waterstone Insolvency, told the room of around 20, mostly unsecured creditors that they were unlikely to recover any money from MCL.

MCL was put into liquidation last month and its assets bought by Maclean Technology Limited (MTL).

Suppliers, vendors, partners, some staff and other unsecured creditors are owed $953,000.

Grant said $419,000 owed to MCL staff will be paid in full by the end of the week, and already 80 percent has been paid out. There is an $18,000 cap on staff payments, anything owed beyond this Grant said will be considered unsecured. The amount owed to staff in this situation is $40,000.

Grant told the meeting that all but three unnamed Maclean staff members have been paid so far.

He said some staff appeared to have used the company’s customer database for business activities outside of Maclean Computing.

Grant would not give details, but said: “Those activities are causing the liquidation an economic loss.” He said he will seek further legal advice on the matter.

During the meeting there were two filed motions - one to create a creditors' committee to oversee further actions taken by Waterstone and another to replace the liquidator entirely.

The motion to create a creditors' committee was supported by the majority of creditors attending the meeting, but downvoted by Clair Arkell representing 28 Maclean staff by proxy. Arkell is listed as Maclean Technology's financial controller on its website.

The motion to replace the liquidator, put forward as an option by Grant himself, was not taken up. Asked by a creditor if Arkell would use her proxy in this vote also, Grant said yes.

Maclean staff have told Computerworld there were several occasions where management had sent them official statements before public announcements made by Grant, including the announcements of the liquidation and sale.

During the meeting Grant denied having knowledge of this, and the staff present confirmed the messages were not from him.

Grant also confirmed he will investigate whether MCL can claw back around $700,000 of payments made to unsecured creditors in the 24 months prior to MCL’s liquidation. Grant would not name the specific companies involved, but a source close to the matter has told Computerworld that Waterstone will attempt to retrieve $200,000 from Westcon Group.

After the meeting a supplier, who requested anonymity, told Computerworld that the liquation of MCL has put strain on his business.

"This entire situation stinks from high heaven. It reflects really poorly on the IT industry, and I can already see the flow of credit becoming much tighter, meaning less room to be innovative and hire more staff," says the supplier.

Computerworld asked a Maclean staff member, who also requested to anonymity, how they felt about the situation.

"I started this month thinking I wouldn't get paid anything, and now I find out I'll be getting most of what I'll be owed. I should be feeling different, but right now I'm just glad to be paid."

Are you a Maclean Computing creditor, or Maclean Technology staff? Send us an email with your side of the story. sim.ahmed@computerworld.co.nz


Timeline
MCL went into liquidation on Friday July 13, 2012. The following Wednesday the company officially announced its assets were sold to Maclean Technology Ltd, who’s directors are Chris Maclean, formerly CEO of MCL, and his business partner Matthew Bellingham.

Timeline (according to Waterstone and creditors) below:

Sunday July 15
- Staff attending the creditors meeting say they were informed of Maclean's liquidation in an email sent by Chris Maclean Sunday evening.

Monday July 16
- Computerworld reports on the liquidation of Maclean Computing Ltd.

Tuesday July 17
- Competitor CodeBlue says it is approaching Maclean customers in order to gain their business.
- Grant accepts offers for MCL assets. These include an offer from Maclean Technology Ltd which the bank accepts by phone (not official until written acceptance given). Grant would not name the bank, however in the liquidators report the ANZ National is the only bank listed.

Wednesday July 18
- Chris Maclean announces he and business partner Matthew Bellingham have formed Maclean Technology Ltd, and purchased MCL’s assets. MTL was registered on the companies office by Alan Maclean late last year.
- Grant says he has tabled Chris Maclean's offer to the bank who is ultimately responsible for deciding whether the purchase can go ahead.

Thursday July 19
- Grant says he has been talking with other potential buyers and passing on this information to the bank. The bank makes a written statement, which makes the sale of MCL to MTL official.
Comments
Here it is! The story has a quote from a staff member:

"I started this month thinking I wouldn't get paid anything, and now I find out I'll be getting most of what I'll be owed. I should be feeling different, but right now I'm just glad to be paid."

The staff got paid and kept their jobs. The most vulnerable people in this mess were looked after.

People posting here all high and mighty forget that. In business firms fail. You must know that if you are in business. If you are a worker you expect to get paid for the work you do. If you are in business you take the risk you will not.

This has been good for the staff and I wonder how often in a failed business that staff get paid what they are owed?

Anyone got any data on that?
Posted by BOB at 11:27:18 on August 16, 2012

Flag abuse

Here it is! Ignorance is bliss. $40000 from staffs fell into unsecured debt as some staff members had more then $18700 owning to them. So let's not pretend that all staffs got paid, they were paid 80 cents in the dollar and still waiting payment for the remainder. Curious if you were owed money how your opinion would change ?
Posted by Your Mum at 18:36:06 on August 16, 2012

Flag abuse

Here it is! Your Mon is unhappy. If a staff member missed out it means that they were paid out over $18,000!

I am assuming that is holiday pay. So, staff got a nice fat cash bonus and Your Mom is still unhappy.

Your Mom should be greatful.
Posted by Bob at 22:35:24 on August 16, 2012

Flag abuse

Here it is! Dear "bob"
How is getting paid SOME of what you have earned and righfully are owed a bonus?
Posted by Anonymous at 9:02:42 on August 17, 2012

Flag abuse

Here it is! Getting some of what you are owed is a bonus when most creditors are getting nothing.

You got paid for holiday pay, which your old employer could have told you to use up over christmas.

The fact is most creditors here are missing out, most of the staff are getting most if not all of what they are owed.

Hands up who would like their employer to pay them cash in the hand for thier outstanding holidays?

Be thankful you got paid and go back to writing code or plugging in USB cables or whatever IT people do.


Posted by Bob at 9:16:45 on August 17, 2012

Flag abuse

Here it is! "bob" Maclean again?
Posted by Anonymous at 13:53:48 on August 16, 2012

Flag abuse

Here it is! how ironic. And you are.....anonymous! Good system though - every time someone makes a positive comment, lets try to make it worth less by saying Chris said it.
Posted by Bobs Uncle at 18:40:59 on August 16, 2012

Flag abuse

Here it is! We don't mind positive comments providing they are factual, even the article states that staff were owed $40K, yet BOB the builder never learnt to read.
Posted by Can we fix it ? at 19:06:14 on August 16, 2012

Flag abuse

Here it is! Agreed the employees should be paid..
But how about the employees of the creditors owed Millions by MCL/MTL incompetence..??!!

How many of those employees are going to loose there jobs..??
Posted by SNMP at 11:40:49 on August 16, 2012

Flag abuse

Here it is! Lets get real here. Firstly, I don't know what the survival rates are for NZ privately owned companies surviving thefts greater than half a million are; but I would expect not very good. Incompetence might be a bit harsh.
Secondly, take out the IRD and the big multi-nationals (the bank, Ingrams, Westcon, IBM), and we're not talking millions - probably a few hundred grand. From that, remove staff because they are being paid as preferential. Then remove Maclean family members because..well, they are family members. Now we're down to a much smaller number, probably less than $5k on average, across lots of creditors. So who's going to lose their jobs exactly? It isn't ideal but hardly going to have an impact on employment rates.
Posted by Realist at 19:23:55 on August 16, 2012

Flag abuse

computerworld
Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.