New Zealand as a global datacentre hub

SUBSCRIBE
Newsletter & Subscriptions Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly.
Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Newsletter & Subscriptions
Get the latest news from Computerworld delivered via email.
Sign up now
With the plug pulled on Pacific Fibre, has the opportunity for NZ to become a prime location for global datacentres gone?

The demise of the Pacific Fibre project, which would have seen a second international cable built between Australia, New Zealand and the US, doesn’t necessarily spell the end of the country hosting overseas data.

New Zealand still has unique advantages as a location for very large global datacentres, according to consultant and entrepreneur John Humphrey, who was one of the founders and former CTO of Pacific Fibre.

New Zealand has stable politics and a supportive government. It has a skilled workforce, low crime rates and a temperate climate, he says. There is also relatively low cost power with a high percentage of renewable sources, such as hydro and wind, and there is the possibility of a dedicated geothermal power station. However, connectivity to the rest of the world is a challenge.

“With [Pacific Fibre] failing, of course, New Zealand’s attraction as a large datacentre location has diminished significantly,” he says.

Nevertheless, the datacentre providers seem open to the idea of welcoming global customers to our shores. Last year, IBM opened a $80 million datacentre south of Auckland, and Fujitsu New Zealand had $80 million in funding for two new datacentres approved by Fujitsu Australia, although these have not been built yet.

“Our plans to build datacentres in New Zealand have not changed, however the timing will be dependent on securing anchor tenants for these facilities,” says Jo Healey, MD Fujitsu New Zealand.

Hewlett Packard abandoned plans to build a $60 million datacentre at Tuakau, in the Counties-Manukau region, and instead announced plans to replace the Tuakau datacentre development with a refreshment of an existing Auckland datacentre, plus a review of locations for an additional site. Computerworld sought an update on these plans but HP declined to comment.

Local demand
Paul Douglas, business manager of integrated technology services at IBM New Zealand, says there is a future for New Zealand as a location for data farms and says he was disappointed to see Pacific Fibre ditch its plans.

“This is a simplistic description, but with only one piece of string between ourselves and Australia, and only one piece of string to the US – if I were an international client I’d be a little bit resistant to put my eggs in that basket. So I do think that will adversely impact our ability to execute that strategy.”

But if someone else built that second cable it could still be possible, he says.

The primary value proposition for New Zealand is around green power, as opposed to powering datacentres with energy produced from polluting sources, Douglas says.

IBM built the South Auckland datacentre to meet demand from local customers and is still seeing a strong interest from the local market, he says.

“We have taken a lot of clients around for tours [of the datacentre]. We have got a lot of proposals with clients and a lot of clients moving into the datacentre.”

There are also “a couple of international customers” in the datacentre, he says.

New Zealand well-positioned
Vocus, which acquired Maxnet in May this year, has always believed in the opportunity for New Zealand as a strong option for datacentre outsourcing – with or without the Pacific Fibre, says Vocus CEO James Spenceley.

“The cost and source of power will become more and more critical in the coming years and this positions New Zealand well – and is the reason we are investing in New Zealand,” Spenceley says.



Maxnet also has some international customers which are using its datacentre. “We have had significant sales success with companies that require spreading their content around the globe,” says Spenceley.

“Additionally, we have seen increased sales activity from Australia putting equipment into New Zealand. In fact, the day we announced the acquisition of Maxnet, we had our first orders for Auckland co-location from our Australian customers.”

Data sovereignty issues
“Along with high redundancy and security, many customers want to know they have physical access to their data should they want to come into the datacentre,” says Spenceley.

IBM’s Douglas says that the businesses that IBM deals with have always been aware of the risks and concerns around data sovereignty. Computerworld asked if the recent Megaupload affair has had any implications on customers’ perception of data sovereignty.

“To be honest with you, no,” Douglas says. “It [the Dotcom episode] has been an example but I don’t think it has created any new awareness.”

Another customer concern is power consumption, continues Spenceley.

“Businesses are looking at greener technology solutions, and our two New Zealand datacentres are powered by 100 percent renewable energy. This is attractive to Australian businesses, which are subject to the new carbon tax law and thus may be looking to reduce their carbon footprint.”

Humphrey too, points out the advantages New Zealand has over Australia as a location for datacentres – in addition to lower wages here, Australia’s carbon intensive electricity generation is forecasted to be up to five times the New Zealand cost, he says.

Tomorrow Ulrika Hedquist asks users about the maturity of local cloud offerings.
Comments
No point Maori will claim zeroes and ones to be their possession, and that will be that.
Posted by Anonymous at 13:50:20 on September 5, 2012

Flag abuse

No point Racisim alive and well at Computerworld.
Posted by Kevin at 16:54:35 on September 7, 2012

Flag abuse

Dream On Without a defence force capable of protecting NZ from the air, which sovereign nations would put data here?
NZ Data belongs here,as for other countries data I think that we are being a little optimistic.


Posted by Anonymous at 9:24:32 on September 5, 2012

Flag abuse

NZ DC's versus AU or anywhere in AP for that matter It really does not matter, as long as service delivery and support management standards (ISO security, ITSM + + + ) at Tier 3 minimum are up to scratch! (as tested to retain ISO certifications at facility management level). Management of applications / business processes within SaaS environments which critical.
Posted by Anonymous at 13:19:43 on September 4, 2012

Flag abuse

Network Resiliency There is no issue with resiliency as demonstrated by 'Tier 1 grade global telco's' which can be extended to local site by providing resilient last mile access for their premium managed services.

Private and public network solutions exist and have done for years, based on this inherent resilient core, backed by strong SLA's up to 99.999% of which one Tier 1 telco has not had a service interruption for their global clients including a few HQ'd in NZ. (incorporating all local NZ sites meched design).

The issue is more appropriately associated to "Forward Capacity demands", which Tier 1 telco's invest in (as per Southern Cross expansions a few years ago, based on a number of carriers needs being met beyond Telecom NZ, and then their is Trans Tasman II - which has been full or close to fully contracted for years.)
Posted by Anonymous at 13:17:55 on September 4, 2012

Flag abuse

Paul Douglas, Paul Douglas should look at the design of the Southern Cross Cable (see Wikipedia). It is a 'figure 8' configuration with built in redundancy - not "only one piece of string".
Posted by Andy T at 11:06:00 on September 4, 2012

Flag abuse

Paul Douglas, I think Paul probably knows it's a figure eight. Unfortunately failing over to the redundant link will add unacceptable latency. The route you point out as being the redundant path also happens to be the most expensive primary route from Australia to the US. Good luck getting your protection bandwidth at a reasonable cost. ideal protection paths are similar latency, not 5 times.
Posted by Anonymous at 15:10:24 on September 6, 2012

Flag abuse

Paul Douglas, I think Paul probably knows it's a figure eight. Unfortunately failing over to the redundant link will add unacceptable latency. The route you point out as being the redundant path also happens to be the most expensive primary route from Australia to the US. Good luck getting your protection bandwidth at a reasonable cost. ideal protection paths are similar latency, not 5 times.
Posted by Anonymous at 15:10:21 on September 6, 2012

Flag abuse

Infrastructure and Distance The biggest problem is our location, being so far away from the Markets we would need to serve and also our single pipe connection to the world. There are reasons why global Datacenters are being based in south east asia, Europe and the USA.

If you take a look at what is being build, by companies such as http://www.switchnap.com/ ... these are in another league from what has been build in NZ.
Posted by Anonymous at 10:04:33 on September 4, 2012

Flag abuse

Global public cloud is safe, low cost and innovative And as long as you choose the right one it can be more secure than a private cloud. In Australia, KPMG found that the public cloud has the greatest potential and provides significantly more benefits that any private cloud. See http://www.kpmg.com/AU/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/modelling-economic-impact-cloud-computing.pdf
Posted by Anonymous at 9:29:47 on September 4, 2012

Flag abuse

Sustainable 60 2013

computerworld
Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.