NZ privacy law 'adequate' for EU trade
Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
Get the latest news from Computerworld delivered via email.
Sign up now
An official finding of “adequacy” in respect of New Zealand’s privacy legislation against European Union standards may be close.
Such a finding would make it easier for New Zealand companies to do business in Europe; in fact according to Privacy Commissioner Marie Shroff last year at least one Kiwi firm had complained that slowness in concluding the EU deliberations on adequacy was handicapping business.
Earlier this month, the chairman of the relevant EU body, the “Article 29 working party”, Jacob Kohnstamm, wrote to Viviane Reding, the Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship at the European Commission, saying the working party had held NZ legislation adequate (following some small amendments) on April 4 last year, shortly following Shroff’s statement. Uruguay’s legislation had been approved by the working party in October 2010, but it had still not had the tick from the EU top echelons.
“Since more than a year has passed, I would like to urge the Commission to make progress on both files and convene a meeting of the [relevant] committee as soon as possible,” Kohnstamm writes.
Some watchers of the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement currently under negotiation between nine non-European countries have predicted some possible strain in seeking to tweak privacy law to simultaneously satisfy TPPA requirements and those of the EU.
A spokesperson at Shroff’s office says “We are unable to comment on [TPPA]; you'd need to contact the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade for further information.” Trade Minister Tim Groser has already said detailed information on the TPPA negotiations will not be released publicly without the permission of all negotiating parties.
Surely the people of NZ must realise that the only justification of the undemocratic secrecy surrounding the TPPA (and ACTA and all recent US-led trade negotiations, which are *really* US IP propagation treaties) is the fact that *the people of the pacific rim countries wouldn't stand for their rights being traded away, if they knew.
The only appropriate thing to do is to work with the other TPPA countries (besides the US, which clearly is no longer a good faith partner) to abandon the current TPPA and to initiate a new agreement among pacific rim countries which is a) held in the open, and b) explicitly rejects US corporate interests.
Posted by Dave Lane at 12:51:17 on April 23, 2012
Because most voters continually vote in ignorance for governments that think they can get away with it and then don't hold them accountable when they try.
If you want anything else cleared up feel free to ask!
Posted by Reality Check at 13:27:40 on April 23, 2012