Pacific Fibre seeks partnership with government

SUBSCRIBE
Newsletter & Subscriptions Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly.
Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Newsletter & Subscriptions
Get the latest news from Computerworld delivered via email.
Sign up now
What’s the national technology plan?, asks Rod Drury
  • Share

Pacific Fibre in talks with the government over a public-private partnership that could see taxpayers investing in a second international telecommunications cable between New Zealand, Australia and the US.

Founder Rod Drury says the company – started by Drury, Sam Morgan and Stephen Tindall – has a proven commercial model but it is seeking government involvement to ensure the cable is a New Zealand based project.

“We are now know we can build the project commercially, we’re comfortable with the business case,” he told Computerworldat the Rural Broadband Sympsium in Rotorua. “We’re now in the philosophical debate about how the sector works things out.”

Drury says the latest estimate is it will cost US $400 million to build the cable. With the initial funding in place – the most recent round raised $5 million – as well as partnership with international cable heavyweight PACNET, Pacific Fibre is on track to finalise contracts in March next year.

A purely commercial model would see demand heavily weighted in favour of Australian customers, and it’s likely the company would need to be registered outside of New Zealand, possibly in Bermuda.

“It would become just another Southern Cross – that would be good for competition up to a point but you can see this as a bit of opportunity to step change our connectivity,” he says.

Pacific Fibre is exploring the idea of per-connection pricing. For example an ISP would purchase a connection, and receive as much bandwidth as was able to be supplied. Drury says this is a different model to the way international connectivity is charged today – ISPs have to estimate how much capacity they require, and if they need more, they pay more – hence the primary reason why they impose data caps on end users.

“We’d run this (Pacific Fibre) as a PPP – as well as it being a commercial project you would also have some NZ Inc type goals, that’s kind of interesting. Because the government’s got to realise that without fixing international, the $1.5 billion (government funding for its Ultra Fast Broadband plan) is at risk,” he says.

“I’m on the phone to the US every day and the call quality is just not reliable. To me the one thing the government can do to help exporters and make NZ better is to put us on the same level as the US. That’s why we’d love to explore per connection charging.”

Drury told the audience at the Rural Broadband Symposium he felt frustrated by the Government’s handling of the UFB and the Rural Broadband Initiative (RBI).

“I think it’s a really scary time for the industry, there’s a lot of uncertainty and I think everyone’s scared that there’s winners and losers. Standing back from it, the bit that frustrates me is that there doesn’t seem to be a national technology plan. We’re in a process and the process means that people can’t actually talk to each other so it’s quite frustrating.”

“What really scares me is the demand side’s not there, so if the government is putting fibre past the curb, what’s the reason for a consumer to connect to that? As important as the work that’s happening in the industry, somebody should be out talking to Apple and working out how do we actually get at all that US content onto our networks, how do we buy that stuff rather than an arcane little company in the middle of Newmarket that’s got some distribution rights. We’ve got to work out where these content pools are so that consumers want to spend $100 or $150 a month on broadband, because it’s going to need that sort of money for the business case to work.”

Earlier, Drury told Computerworld that what’s required is a circuit breaker: “We need to get the industry in the room. I think the industry’s pretty motivated to work out a solution but you need someone strong enough to actually run the process.”

“It’s good that we’re focused on it but you’d hardly say it’s a coordinated national strategy would you?”

Attending the Symposium are some of the country’s top executives in ICT, including Vodafone CEO Russell Stanners. He told Computerworld the reason he’s attending the two-day conference is to because the telco is wants to participate in the RBI, tenders for which close next month.

“I think it’s a big opportunity and we’re going to put a bid in for the rural broadband initiative so being here is two things. It’s a learning experience for me just to get a feel for what they’re talking about and hopefully it demonstrates that we’re very serious.”

ICT Minister Steven Joyce gave a presentation by video link. When asked whether there would any further announcements on who Crown Fibre Holdings intends to partner with in the UFB, he was told the audience it would be soon.

“We are expecting announcements on the first partners shortly, as I’ve said all the way through that doesn’t mean we’ll have announcements on every partner,” he says.

“I will make announcements shortly, they might not necessarily be by the end of this month but they won’t be too far away.”

A spokesperson for CFH says it is on track to deliver recommendations to the shareholding Ministers by the end of October.
Comments
People love to bash Apple I for one would be quite prepared to pay for content if it didn't include advertising and it was able to be used on multiple devices. Americans get alot of good content which we can only drool about. Why bash Apple? They have simply created a delivery tool and billing system that works. Any producers of movies, music etc can use it. It would encourage more NZ studios to use the model they have made successful already. IP TV ftw! Less crap free TV adverts... You watch 35 minutes of actual progamming for 25minutes commercials. Waste of time... Bring on the cable and more broadband for all :)
Posted by Anonymous at 15:23:56 on November 1, 2010

Flag abuse

Is it 'past the curb' or to the door "What really scares me is the demand side's not there, so if the government is putting fibre past the curb, what's the reason for a consumer to connect to that?"

Not even getting consistent messages from the telcos or so called entrepeneurs
Posted by Anonymous at 9:53:15 on October 30, 2010

Flag abuse

Demand Apple wants us to use broadband to download videos, music and fart-apps. Govt thinks its prime use will be to tell a farmer, remotely, how fat a cow's udder is and a tourist what happened in 1863 to some undistinguished building he's viewing through his smartphone.

Any ideas in the vast space between those regions - apart from vague generalities about "health and education"?

Put your thinking caps on, Kiwis...oh, sorry, "caps" is probably an unfortunate word in the context.
Posted by Anonymous at 6:25:40 on October 30, 2010

Flag abuse

Demand When the video surveillance cameras start turning up in our homes, we'll realise why govt really wanted to subsidise broadband :)
Posted by Irv Ogby at 6:35:13 on October 30, 2010

Flag abuse

I thik its a good way to get money out of NZ faster. Hmmm, so Sam etc want the public to fund part of this commercially viable venture...because it will be easier for Apple and other American content vendors to sell their music in NZ?.
From his point of view a nice solid investor like the govt sounds like a good plan, faster content to consumers is also good, hundreds of millions of NZ $ going to America for music and movies...not so good.
From a NZ inc point of view how is this a good idea, isnt the idea for fast broadband to the home, to somehow magically add value to NZ as a whole?
Presumably to help us make, sell and develop our stuff?
Sounds a bit to me like NZ inc looses as we find a really good way to send more dollars out the door for, unproductive music and movies.
Im not really convinced, if its commercially viable, why not just do it, if they want to do something good for NZ with their commercially viable venture then why not base it here rather than the Bahamas and make a little less.

Posted by Anonymous at 15:58:38 on October 29, 2010

Flag abuse

UFB,CFH etc I agree to some point about getting acces to content much more easier and cost effective way. That has to be driven by the industry and their marketing and strategic plans. The UFB is only a solution to provide faster access to the roadside or the building, but what about extending the fibre technology in homes. Most NZ homes are old and will require upgrading the wiring before they will get the full benefit from the UFB. I do not agree that the govt should pitch in for another undersea cable between NZ & AUS/US. SX has ample capacity and reliable and robust network to amp the capacity as demand rises. Maybe the solution is for companies like Pacific Fibre and Kordia to work with SX or even the govt to work with SX to see how it may be able to provide capacity requirements as the UFB project goes from all the noise to a successful implementation. I also think the Govt should stop playing stupid games and make a decision about who the partners will be in CFH. Investors don't like uncertainity in the market and they will take their money somewhere else. Companies like Telecom who invest heavily in infrastructure are also not sure how they should plan their future given the govt's indecision. To me it feels like Mr Joyce needs to understand the industry or use the knowledge in the industry to drive decisions. He is not astute and capable enough to make those decisions on his own.
Posted by MCS at 15:11:29 on October 29, 2010

Flag abuse

Fundraiser How about fund raising cakes?
Posted by Sid at 12:29:02 on October 29, 2010

Flag abuse

Tithe Why not use the Brian Tamaki model and impose a tithe on all the true believers (in broadband)? 10% / week ... only this time the money actually goes into fibre rather than flash houses and motorcycles.
Posted by Onyx at 11:45:16 on October 29, 2010

Flag abuse

Crown to Pay?? Sorry guys, Govt is all tapped out... just invested in Hobbtis and South Canterbury Finance.


Posted by Anonymous at 10:59:39 on October 29, 2010

Flag abuse

computerworld
Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.