TelstraClear sale: Has Vodafone paid too much?
LATEST NEWS
SUBSCRIBE
Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly. Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
TUANZ warns of cosy duopoly if sale goes ahead
By Randal Jackson and Sarah Putt | Auckland | Thursday, 12 July, 2012 | 2 Comments
IDC telecommunications analyst Peter Wise says the price Vodafone is paying for TelstraClear - $840 million – seems a little high.
Telstra announced it will sell its New Zealand subsidiary TelstraClear this morning, although the sale is subject to approval by three government agencies.
Wise suggests the price may be high because there is cash on the balance sheet, but he stresses this is only speculation.
He says both parties appear to have navigated spectrum concerns. Each is limited to 25MHz but Telstra in Australia will retain 5MHz so Vodafone won’t exceed its cap.
Meanwhile TUANZ CEO Paul Brislen warns that the sale could lead to a “cosy duopoly” in the telecommunications market between Vodafone/TelstraClear and Telecom.
“I'm very hopeful that this is a good thing [the sale] but the danger of the cosy duopoly must be considered," he says.
"On the one hand it gives us a real competitor to Telecom for the first time ever - Vodafone and TelstraClear combined have a fixed line market of about 30 percent - still a long way short of Telecom but far stronger than any other player. The danger is that they become a cosy duopoly, carve up the market and sit there without competing properly.
“I'd hope that Vodafone has learned from Telecom's mistakes and won't go down that track - it would be disastrous if we ended up having to regulate a future Vodafone the way we have Telecom.
Brislen says the impact of the sale will affect will be felt by FX Networks in the national backhaul market and 2degrees in the mobile market.
“The real concern should lie around FX Networks and 2degrees and how they respond in their respective markets - both now face two large, integrated competitors and how that shakes out will be very telling.”
Comments
and your point is?
(other than demonstrating your lack of social graces and propensity for ad hominem attacks).
Paul is the chief employee, sole executive, and an officer of TUANZ; he's perfectly qualified to be called the CEO. He's especially qualified to comment because of his past. He's also entitled NOT to have to put up with tasteless crap from you.
Posted by Nuther Oldy at 16:31:41 on July 13, 2012
Paul is the chief employee, sole executive, and an officer of TUANZ; he's perfectly qualified to be called the CEO. He's especially qualified to comment because of his past. He's also entitled NOT to have to put up with tasteless crap from you.
Posted by Nuther Oldy at 16:31:41 on July 13, 2012
CEO?
Isn't CEO rather a grand title, considering he is the only employee?
Please note: this comment has been moderated.
Posted by Anonymous at 10:57:46 on July 13, 2012
Posted by Anonymous at 10:57:46 on July 13, 2012
MOST POPULAR
Social Media @Computerworld NZ

Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.





