Updated: New Zealand's internet filter goes live
Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
Get the latest news from Computerworld delivered via email.
Sign up now
The Department of Internal Affairs' (DIA) internet filter is now operational and is being used by ISPs Maxnet and Watchdog.
Thomas Beagle, spokesperson for online freedom lobby Tech Liberty says he's "very disappointed that the filter is now running, it’s a sad day for the New Zealand internet”.
He told Computerworld the filter went live on February 1 but DIA has delayed announcing that until it held a meeting with its Independent Reference Group. He says he's disappointed the launch was conducted in such a "stealthy mode".
The manager of the Department of Internal Affairs' Censorship Compliance Unit, Steve O'Brien, denies any subterfuge in the launch, saying the trial has been going on for two years and that has been communicated to media for "quite some time".
"The Independent Reference Group has met and the filter system processes were demonstrated as set out in the code of practice, that is that the website filtering system prevents access to known websites containing images of child sexual abuse," says O'Brien.
Beagle says the DIA refuses to say which other ISPs will be joining the filter, claiming the right to negotiate in secret.
However, Tech Liberty understands that Telstra Clear, Telecom and Vodafone have said they will implement the filter, with Orcon, Slingshot and Natcom saying that they won’t.
Vodafone spokesman Paul Brislen says Vodafone took part in the filter trial and is awaiting word from the DIA about the next steps. The company will likely use the filter, he says, and when it does customers will be informed.
TelstraClear spokesman Chris Mirams says TelstraClear was the first tier one telco to join the trial. The company is now waiting to hear about next steps from DIA.
"We informed our customers of the trial, received positive feedback from them and its likely we will participate further," he says.
A Telecom spokeswoman says Telecom has been in discussion with the Department of Internal Affairs and is "very conscious of working with them to address this serious issue".
"At this stage we are still reviewing the details of the Digital Child Exploitation Filtering System with a view to establishing the best way forward," she says.
Orcon CEO Scott Bartlett says it is not true to say Orcon will not be taking part.
"We are still working with officials to fully evaluate this and ensure it doesn't impact on our customers' experience," he says.
Maxnet CEO John Hanna says it has provided internet filtering to its customers for 10 years by means of its Net Guardian product.
“We’ve been involved in the DIA trial for two years and to my knowledge we’ve never had a complaint. The filtering certainly hasn’t diminished the quality of our internet — we’ve been voted among the top three internet providers in Consumer Magazine polls for a number of years,” he says.
“Filtering out child pornography is also very much in line with our company values — our customers would be disappointed to hear if we weren’t participating. So participation for us has always been a no-brainer.”
He says as soon as Maxnet gets official notification from the DIA regarding its endorsement of the system, the company will be informing its customer base of its intention to permanently deploy filtering.
O'Brien says there is no compulsion for ISPs to tell their customers their internet service is being filtered.
"It's a voluntary system and there's no legislation," he says, adding he understands the ISPs currently on the system have informed their customers.
David Zanetti, technical spokesperson for Tech Liberty, says he fears the stability of the New Zealand internet will be at risk.
"It is a single point of failure, introduces a new and very tempting target for hackers, and by diverting traffic will cause issues with modern internet applications.”
O'Brien, however, says ISPs are being brought on gradually in a staggered way.
Tech Liberty says it is also concerned about the expansion of government powers represented by the filter.
"It establishes the principle that the government can choose to arbitrarily set up a new censorship scheme and choose which material to block, with no reference to existing law," the group claims.
TechLiberty says the list of what is filtered is kept secret, in direct contrast to the rest of New Zealand’s censorship regime where the Chief Censor must publish decisions banning offensive material.
O'Brien says the Department is writing to all ISPs advising them that the filter is available to them and they will be brought on gradually.
"We anticipate all major ISPs will embrace this development as they have the many other filters they employ on the internet for a range of purposes.
"The Digital Child Exploitation filter provides them with the means to prevent their customers from accessing these illegal websites, inadvertently or otherwise and will assist in raising awareness of the worldwide problem of child sexual exploitation."
He says trials over two years showed that the filter does not affect the speed or stability of the internet and participating ISPs are happy with the performance of the system.
Filter is designed to stop web based services such as websites/forums from public seeing child porn.
The filter will not stop private markets such as hidden forums (cloaked sites), FTP, P2P, Torrents etc etc but the average user will not know how to use these, and if they did they would need to know where to get the username/password or trackers to download the content.
If someone can do that, then they are activley looking for child porn, and therefore should be put in jail.
Posted by Anon at 12:46:43 on March 16, 2010
Posted by Anonymous at 12:49:50 on March 15, 2010
It's easy just cancel service with an ISP that uses the filter, some smart person will start an ISP that doesn't use the Filter and promote themselves as OPEN ISP.
Posted by Anonymous at 10:14:27 on March 14, 2010
The mere fact they want to make it secret and exempt from freedom of information act is the main telling factor here, they can then like china, block freedom, vaccine dangers, 911 investigation and anything that it now proving embarrasing and there is NO way for people to see how much they are being censored under the "guise" of protecting the children..
Like Climategate lets raise the taxes to save the planet! of course the sun has nothing to do with heating up our planet! - but in time with enough filtering thats what people will believe because thats all they have access to.
Posted by bob at 21:17:00 on March 12, 2010
The NZ'ders favorite choice for bypassing the filter is?......
Posted by Weightgain4000 at 14:31:41 on March 12, 2010
Posted by Rod at 12:37:05 on March 12, 2010
Yet filters will definitely succeed at various other unintended goals which voters I assume will be not so keen on:
The filter will create a framework for government censorship of free media. An example slipery slope: Ban first child pornography, then normal adult pornography, then movies containing pornography, then movies containing sex scenes, then movies with a restricted rating. Where do you stop?
The filter will also create the opportunity for mistakes to be made. In the social web, where site owners are often not directly responsible for content (eg: youtube) will a site owner and legitimate businessman end up being arbitrarily blacklisted due to "illicit" content, when they had no say over the creation or distribution of said content? What recourse will they have?
The filter will also create a target for hackers to cause widespread outages.
The filter will also create bottlenecks that will reduce internet speed at high volumes.
The filter will also puts us at odds with the United States. Oppose the world's biggest economy is not smart. I finish with Hillary Clinton, US Senator, as cited in the Guardian:
"Clinton likened online censorship by countries such as China, Vietnam and Iran to the rise of communist Europe, warning that a new "information curtain" threatened to descend on the world unless action to protect internet freedoms was taken."
Posted by Rod at 12:34:50 on March 12, 2010
Please don't rely on others to do the dirty work for you!!
Posted by Anonymous at 2:23:15 on March 12, 2010
Posted by Ben at 21:11:15 on March 11, 2010
Posted by just great - I love it. lets get rid of the army and navy - we are all safe now!!! bravo!!! at 14:06:10 on March 11, 2010