Curse of the quarter acre section

SUBSCRIBE
Newsletter & Subscriptions Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly.
Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Newsletter & Subscriptions
Get the latest news from Computerworld delivered via email.
Sign up now
Laying fibre from the street to the house
  • Share

The deployment of Ultra Fast Broadband will be more of a civil engineering challenge than an electrical engineering or communications one, according to Crown Fibre Holdings (CFH) CEO Graham Mitchell.

He outlined some of the civil engineering challenges unique to New Zealand during his presentation at the Telecommunications and ICT Summit in Auckland. These include low population density, houses being located on average 15 to 20 metres from the street, and the fact some of the country’s major cities are built on volcanic rock, glacial rock or riverbed. Then there is the troublesome quarter-acre section, considered by many Kiwis to be akin to a birthright.

“When my parents were growing up the standard things was a quarter-acre section, a flagon of beer and pavlova. I think the flagon has been replaced with pinot noir or pinot gris these days, but the quarter-acre section still exists. Or some smart people have divided it and put three townhouses on it, which has put even more pressure on our infrastructure,” Mitchell says.

It is estimated that digging trenches and laying cables can be as much as 80 percent of the cost of building a fibre to the home network. As the CFH wants to help ensure the access price to the network is at a price point low enough to stimulate demand, it is looking at ways to help its potential partners by advocating for micro-trenching, and other techniques such as deploying fibre to houses via existing water pipes.

CFH, together with the Ministry of Economic Development and the Digital Auckland Working Group have released a discussion document on developing nationwide standards to cover shallow trenching and other fibre cable deployment techniques. The proposal includes piloting such techniques locally, to test the feasibility of the standards developed and ensure they are robust and will endure. Standards that are developed are likely to be included in the Utilities Code that will have regulation status under the Utilities Act 2010.
Comments
Can't win Let me get this straight. A house on a quarter acre section is troublesome because the house is 20m from the street. Put three houses on that quarter acre - REDUCING the total cabling requirement - and THAT is troublesome for burdening the infrastructure?

What, exactly, are we striving for here?
Posted by Allister at 14:04:53 on July 15, 2010

Flag abuse

The quarter-acre section Of course, the man is right! Forget the vexatious nit-picking and settle for his underpinning argument that NZ has a low, loosely scattered population which makes all the technological wonderland hard to reach - at least at a cost-effective figure. In many places in New Zealand it would be better to drive to the libary than spend a fortune in energy and dollars bringing it to the gate.
Posted by Peterkar at 18:05:38 on July 13, 2010

Flag abuse

Stop paying these clowns Get the job done!
We have been paying these clowns for 20 years and still have rapacious charges and lots of hot air.

As a country we get what we sow, or sold when we allowed the clowns to run the caucus (read circus)and sold the interests of NZers to their backhand (broadband) mates.
What are the chances of a superconductor enhanced by hot air?
We have wasted countless words and money on diatribe like this and still got no further ahead.

I voted for the other lot by the way as this lot acted like predicted against the interests of the many for their few.

Whew.

I fell better now.
You all have a play!
Posted by peters at 20:33:46 on July 9, 2010

Flag abuse

0.24 acre? You must be joking! There are frig-all quarter acre sections these days, in Christchurch anyway. Even back in the 50's most were 1/8 acre and nowadays they shove 3-4 townhouses on that much land.
It's true, however, that our suburban sprawl is expensive. Every phone line, sewer pipe, water main, power cable, bus route, garbage collector, junk mail deliverer, etc has to travel that much further to get to the next customer plus the added cost of those extra metres of tarmac and concrete gutters. In Europe and much of urban America, each section would have 2-3-4 or more apartments above it leading to much greater density. You win some, you lose some.....
Posted by Kiwiiano at 14:17:43 on July 9, 2010

Flag abuse

IPv6

computerworld
Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.