Open access isn't good enough - Kordia

SUBSCRIBE
Newsletter & Subscriptions Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly.
Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Newsletter & Subscriptions
Get the latest news from Computerworld delivered via email.
Sign up now
Crown Fibre Holdings to set pricing on fibre network
  • Share

The government is touting the Ultra Fast Broadband initiative as an open access fibre network, but Kordia says this is not the same thing as pricing equivalence.

Kordia CEO Geoff Hunt says layer one services must be priced lower than layer two, or the UFB is in danger of becoming monopoly controlled. “Without companies such as Kordia investing in lighting layer one, the monopolies at the layer two level will kill the innovation that competition brings,” he claims.

“We think that over the next 20 years that technology, the lighting technology, will change in ways that we have not yet thought of. So it is important that when we build this infrastructure that we make it as future proofed as possible.”

ICT Minister Steven Joyce announced last week that pricing will be set by Crown Fibre Holdings (CFH) following the tender process and that, “there will be limited scope for regulatory intervention to alter those prices while the industry is still immature”.

The 18 companies who responded to the Invitation to Participate are invited to submit revised proposals on the “modified UFB model and regulatory regime”.

But companies that aren’t bidding to partner with the government, but plan to provide layer two services on the new network, are effectively shut out of the process. Hunt and Kordia corporate affairs general manager Susie Stone told Computerworld they have discussed their concerns with CFH, as well as the Ministry of Economic Development and the New Zealand Regional Fibre Group. Stone says she is comfortable with statements made by national bidder Axia NetMedia, but they have not spoken with Telecom on this issue. If she did have a voice in the process, her message would be: “Open access isn’t good enough”.

Meanwhile TUANZ CEO Ernie Newman supports the Minister’s changes. “The decision to require Local Fibre Cos to offer both (layer one and two) is a pragmatic and effective solution. It will allow the buyer, rather than the seller, to choose the service they require,” he says.

“With regard to the planned ‘regulatory holiday’, we accept the reality that the protection of consumers from the concentration of market power has to be traded off against the necessary climate of certainty for investors. We are comfortable with the concept of regulatory forbearance at this stage. However, the devil will be in the detail and we will watch the process carefully as it unfolds.”

Key terms as defined by ICT Minister Steven Joyce

Open Access
Open access is a key principle underlying the UFB Initiative, and means that ultra-fast broadband must be made available to any service provider that seeks access to it on equal terms. This will in turn enable a vibrant and competitive service provider market. It is critical that the networks built provide the highest levels of interoperability with other networks and are future proofed. Local Fibre Companies (LFCs) will be required to deal with the market in a fair and equitable manner, providing for equality of access and allow consumers to switch easily between providers. Specifically, LFCs will be required to sell services to a “non-discrimination” standard.

Layer 1 services
Services that operate at Layer 1 of the Open Systems Interconnection Model of network architecture. Layer 1 is normally associated with passive fibre optic network infrastructure.

Layer 2 services
Services that operate at Layer 2 of the Open Systems Interconnection Model of network architecture. Layer 2 is normally associated with active fibre optic network infrastructure (the electronics that light fibre).
Comments
Open access isn't good enough I applaud Kordia's insight but hey ... While "Build it and they will come" is a great approach (especially if you know about baseball), isn't it time we move past the detail of supply-side infrastructure conversations about Broadband toward fostering a flock of vigorous discussions that allow for Kiwi individuals and organisations to learn about, explore and develop beneficial ways to use and apply this wonderful opportunity as it comes into in their worlds?
Posted by Ian Howard at 11:38:45 on July 9, 2010

Flag abuse

Correction required?? In the seven layer OSI model, Layer 1 is considered the physcial layer. It covers the physical characteristic definitions such as interface connectors, voltages etc. Lighting the Fibre is normally consider a Layer 1 characteristic.
Layer 2 defines the Data link Layer or protocol that two network entities can communicate using a physical address. This is mosttly defined by the ISO 802.x stream. Ethernet is an example of a Layer 2 protocol.

Access providers using Layer 2 services normally try to extract additional value by creating artifical pricing constructs. An example of an artifical pricing construct is the creation of a priority class of traffic for voice and/or video. This would normally be charged at a premium over general data. Where a single entity provides this construct is can effectively set the market price for any value added services provided by content providers.

IMHO it is imperitive that UFB provides non discriminated Layer 1 access pricing for access seekers for UFB to be successful.
Posted by Anonymous at 12:10:09 on July 8, 2010

Flag abuse

Correction required?? Im familiar with the OSI model but as we all know too well, sometimes things become fuzzy when placed against the OSI model. Perhaps a better comparison would be the US DOD model. This model exists for a reason, because it can help remove some of the overlap.

As a subscriber on an already created OAN, (Alberta Supernet in Canada managed by AXIA) I can agree that the services exist at layer 1. If you wish to get technical, you could probably win the argument that it does in fact perform layer 2 technical roles. The difference however, is that from the subscriber or content provider's point of view, layer 2 is effectively layer 1.

For example, I have a VPN that runs on equipment shared with multiple parties over shared fiber. I can in fact perform my own QoS using my own rules, provided I follow the technical specifications states by the OAN management group. So you see, I can shovel out traffic on DCSP 46 as much as I would like, but the VPN provided to me has subscriber limits I cannot adjust (without adjusting my subscription through the provider).

So, from the OAN management groups perspective, layer 1 and 2 are completely separate. From the subscriber's perspective, layer 1 is physical, but guess what.. since connectivity is completely provided by the OAN VPN and its specifications that I have absolutely no control over, the data link layer becomes grey as to whether it is in fact layer 1 or 2. The data link layer becomes muddles with the actual connection requirements of the OAN.

IMHO, this is one of the greatest benefits to OAN, having L1 and L2 basically become a single entity provided by the group managing the OAN. You subscribe and toss your data at it. IE) the end user truly starts at Layer 2. So whether or not you see the service as complete L1 or L2, the subscriber basically begins at L2. So, for simplicity sake, OAN networks have basically just smushed the service together. The passive connectivity and the "active" transport of whatever data you wish to toss onto it. You do not control the routing you only control what you place on the network.

Again, its grey, and Im not saying you were incorrect, but rather, once on an OAN you will understand how not only is physical connectivity layer 1, but the transparent network operating at Layer 2 which operates BELOW yours and others VPNs also becomes essentially layer 1 as well.

As an end user, you will have no idea what Layer 2 is actually happening on the OAN. You will instead be able to control your own layer 2 access to the OAN.

I hope that helps clarify a tad
Posted by Dude on OAN at 4:51:17 on July 14, 2010

Flag abuse

IPv6

computerworld
Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.