TelstraClear's Freeth warns of 'network socialism'
LATEST NEWS
- Revera plans twin datacentre on Upper Hutt site
- Telco analyst predicts fibre broadband uptake will be low
- Government seeks syndicated web services supply
- NZ game industry: Insights from local studios || 2
- Opinion: Speed dating matches govt with vendors || 1
- Maxnet acquired by Australian company for $9.5 million || 1
SUBSCRIBE
Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly. Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
TelstraClear CEO says Chorus is best bet for ultra-fast broadband
By Stephen Bell | Wellington | Tuesday, 20 April, 2010 | 3 Comments
TelstraClear CEO Allan Freeth is championing Telecom’s Chorus wholesale division as the best candidate to provide the government's planned $1.5 billion Ultra-Fast Broadband (UFB) network.
Freeth, speaking as part of a panel of Telecom senior executives at the TUANZ Telecommunications Day conference in Wellington, also warned about "network socialism" — the use of public money to overbuild privately funded networks.
Freeth says TelstraClear has a good record in working with telcos large and small, but warns that his company is likely to be less attracted to collaboration with providers overbuilding existing fibre infrastructure.
“Public money being used to overbuild privately funded networks is simply like network socialism to me," he says.
“We neither intend to be accepting or welcoming of any such new guys and new entrants should factor that into their business case.”
The way UFB is set up at the moment, he told the conference is complex and includes artificial limitations such as the exclusion of wireless technology and of providers that have a retail arm.
“To us, the present proposal [with its many potential players] looks likely to play out in a way that’s reminiscent of the Tragedy of the Commons,” Freeth says.
The Tragedy of the Commons describes a situation in which a number of individuals, acting independently, and solely considering their own self-interest, will deplete or degrade a shared resource even when it is clear that it is not in anyone's long-term interest for this to happen.
“I personally believe we should choose the player or the team with the best chance of maximising the ‘commons’ — that is, the limited resource — for the best outcome,” Freeth says.
“In this case, that’s probably Chorus. Let’s find a way for them to do so, while regulating for open access and equivalence.”
This applies, he says, whether or not Chorus is structurally separated from the retail arm of Telecom — a possibility increasingly under discussion.
Refering to the variety of bidders seeking a piece of the UFB deal and the possibility Telecom could be shut out, Freeth changed tack.
“To use an analogy more fitting of 2011, I am at a loss as to why you would set up a system for regional cricket teams to play the Rugby World Cup, having excluded the All Blacks, because they are involved in merchandising,” Freeth told the conference.
He went on to say, however, that “you can’t fight City Hall” and something like the current UFB plan is likely to eventuate.
TelstraClear, he says, has a record of working in collaboration with both large established telecommunications providers and small newcomers.
He pointed to TelstraClear’s work with Network Tasman in 2004.
“They had built a new 170 km back-up fibre link from Nelson to Blenheim, where it connected with TelstraClear’s existing national fibre network.
“We then extended the reach of their services by deploying wireless local loop equipment, and offering a full suite of services, across fibre and wireless, to businesses in the Nelson region.
“Then, in 2008, we worked with Northpower as they built their fibre network, and formed a strong partnership…These ventures demonstrate our ability to partner with non-telco organisations, and operate across multiple networks and technologies.”
Comments
"Network Socialism"
You mean, like how the local loop-which turned out to be so vitally important for broadband Internet-got built in the first place ... by a Government-controlled monopoly?
Posted by Lawrence D'Oliveiro at 14:20:47 on April 20, 2010
Posted by Lawrence D'Oliveiro at 14:20:47 on April 20, 2010
"Network Socialism"
What you say is perfectly true but the point you make is completely wrong,. At the time our copper local loop was laid we had a prohibition on privately owned companies from providing telecommunications services - and broadcasting television and radio, and delivering maio, and retailing electricity and ... so on..
Posted by Teacher to student at 8:09:15 on April 25, 2010
Posted by Teacher to student at 8:09:15 on April 25, 2010
"Network Socialism"
I'm sorry but I dont recall any private company investing in network infrastructure on a national scale when the first sections of copper were laid. Also, opening up the local loop did not really do a huge amount to open up the access speeds, ADSL2+ was already available from the existing network by the time LLU was done. What has opened up the speed of internet connection speeds has been the shortening of the copper loop.
Posted by Richard at 18:35:54 on April 20, 2010
Posted by Richard at 18:35:54 on April 20, 2010
MOST POPULAR
- NZ game industry: Govt support for development increasing
- Raspberry Pi arrives in New Zealand
- Video, connection costs major factors in broadband uptake: ComCom
- Spotify launches in New Zealand and Australia today
- Telco analyst predicts fibre broadband uptake will be low
- NASA on 'brink of a new future' with SpaceX launch
Social Media @Computerworld NZ

Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.




