The case of the disappearing revenues
LATEST NEWS
- Revera plans twin datacentre on Upper Hutt site
- Telco analyst predicts fibre broadband uptake will be low
- Government seeks syndicated web services supply
- NZ game industry: Insights from local studios || 2
- Opinion: Speed dating matches govt with vendors || 1
- Maxnet acquired by Australian company for $9.5 million || 1
SUBSCRIBE
Computerworld is New Zealand's only specialised information systems fortnightly. Subscribe now for $100 (23 issues) and save more than 37% off the cover price!
SIGN UP
Telco chiefs give their views on financial challenges at Summit
By Sarah Putt | Auckland | Tuesday, 6 July, 2010 | 5 Comments
At the Telecommunications and ICT Summit during the CEO Series, as each panellist completed their speech they left the stage, leaving the final speaker Kordia's Geoff Hunt to remark that he felt as if he were in an Agatha Christie novel: what was up with the disappearing chief executives?
It was of course a light-hearted remark, but it felt strangely apt; their physical departure a kind of metaphor for their declining revenues.
The stage was set earlier in the day by Telecommunications Commissioner Ross Patterson who began his speech with the following observation:
"The transition from the PSTN to an IP-based network brings about a paradigm shift in market structure and dynamics, the value chain alters, revenue sources change and business models are adapting. A number of issues arise. The greatest level of investment is required at the network layer to address broadband speed, the speed is regarded by consumers as a commodity and revenue does not match investment," he told the audience.
The telcos are being forced to invest in an infrastructure that is unlikely to provide the same revenues as the copper network. And to compound matters it appears that the riches that are to be gained in a fibre network may be taken by those companies that haven't paid a cent towards it - Google and Apple are the global examples most often cited.
TelstraClear CEO Allan Freeth was typically forthright in airing his concerns about the impact the government's Ultra Fast Broadband initiative is likely to have on the existing players in the telco space.
"Telecommunications is an industry that needs a lot of capital. Therefore businesses operating in this industry need scale and volume to create enough wealth and value to sustain themselves and to make more capital investment, and then to provide a fair and adequate return to their investors.
"Fragmentation of the industry and the consequential diminuation of profit pools means that telcos and related businesses do not generate enough value to be self-sustaining. In that situation telcos do not have enough strength to be the load bearing wall of the house, that role, as a consequence must fall to government.
"I would contend right here, right now that we're renovating an architecture with not enough thought of consequences intended or unintended in the medium to long term," he warned.
"The dilemma of over the top providers such as TradeMe, eBay and Google making the money while the telecommunications industry incurs the cost is still unresolved. Telcos' core business is going backwards," he said. There are a number in the industry that contend it won't be long before the core business of telecommunications - voice - is free. In fact a recent study showed the decline to be faster than the core business of the postal industry."
Freeth says TelstraClear invests around $100 million a year in New Zealand telecommunications, the most recent being a $10 million upgrade of the HFC cable in Christchurch and Wellington. This will provide subscribers with downstream speeds of 100Mbps and upload speeds of 10Mbps. The company intends to offer some users the chance to trial fast speed modems. "That's the telco equivalent of allowing you to take a Formula 1 car around the Monte Carlo circuit," he says.
Freeth was followed by Vodafone CEO Russell Stanners who made the rather headline grabbing suggestion that the taxpayer's contribution to the UFB should increase from $1.5 billion to $5 billion (see story from Computerworld online below).
Stanners pointed out that it is not only the fixed line revenues that are suffering. Mobile is also wrestling with a similar conundrum of high customer expectations in the face of declining revenues. He told the audience that a Vodafone Group company in Europe has found that while just 20 percent of its revenue is generated from mobile data, it consumes 65 percent of the network's capacity.
In his speech Telecom CEO Paul Reynolds talked about the lessons of XT, highlighting the amount of media coverage the outages received, but claiming that the independent review showed that the network had been specified to a high level and pointing out that New Zealand may soon have three 3G networks.
He says Telecom has 25,000 kilometres of fibre in the ground already and that it would be "bonkers" to duplicate assets. He says that structurally separating Telecom is complex. "Its not like cutting scissors through the network, the issues are huge", and that it has only been attempted in two countries - Singapore and Mongolia (the latter, according to Reynolds, unsuccessfully).
The UFB will create a "seismic shift" in New Zealand telecommunications, and it was considered so important by Telecom that three of its top executive team are engaged in working towards a solution. Reynolds was clear the company's preference is to work with the government, but if that didn't occur it would compete although this would not be desirable. "The last thing New Zealand Inc needs is for our largest private investor to end up competing with the government."
Reynolds says the UFB process is costing Telecom's shareholders. "Anything from 24 percent to 33 percent of the value of our company is lost to our shareholders because of the uncertainty."
Surviving the demise of the technology your company has built a robust business case on is clearly challenging the CEOs of the country's top three telcos. However,the last panellist, Kordia's CEO Geoff Hunt,provided some insight into how his company was managing the switch to a new technology platform. The State Owned Enterprise was previously the transmission arm of TVNZ and responsible for providing the analogue television service. It has aggressively sought out new revenues in preparation for the switch over from analogue to digital television, which has included the acquisition of ISP Orcon, the purchase of WiMAX spectrum (incidentally, Hunt says Kordia is looking to partner on a national WiMax rollout), and the possibility of building a trans-Tasman cable.
Hunt says the business will survive the switchover to digital and the subsequent loss of revenue from analogue transmission — if it occurs in 2015 it will be a "bump" in Kordia's revenues, if it occurs in 2013 it will be "pothole".
Comments
www.nzbroadbandmap.govt.nz
Thanks to David Cunliffe and the Digital Stratgey
Posted by Anonymous at 13:45:16 on July 7, 2010
Posted by Anonymous at 13:45:16 on July 7, 2010
tell us more...
great article, but makes me want to know more... 25,000km of fibre already.. how much of NZ does that cover, what about citylink and vector.. how many km's do they have in the ground.. what about a map of the country with fibre shown in coloured lines per company...
where there are gaps is where it needs filling?
Are the different parts all the same quality from telecom/vector etc..
many thanks
Posted by soapbyte at 23:24:27 on July 6, 2010
where there are gaps is where it needs filling?
Are the different parts all the same quality from telecom/vector etc..
many thanks
Posted by soapbyte at 23:24:27 on July 6, 2010
Looking back and forward
Divide the annual profits of Telecom by the number of households in NZ and you get some sense of the magnitude of the burden this company has been on NZ over the years. Each year this company increases the monthly fee for a domestic phone while every other "electronic" based service or product in this world is declining in cost. Even more cynically they offer cheaper rentals in geographic areas where they face competition not where the real economies of scale prevail in Auckland. In the end it is just greed that drives their actions. Unfortunately the telco industry is full of similarly driven people who rely on confusing pricing arrangements, small print contracts, cross subsidisation, lock-in, and monopolies to advance their positions. If you want another example you only need to look at the history of the mobile interconnection rate held artificially high for years simply to thwart competition. Why does it cost 20 cents to send a text on a mobile phone in some situations while in others they cost 0.5 cents each? These are clever people and the sooner the government comes to the realisation that it will never be able to create a telco environment that operates as a truly competitive market the better. My street only needs one conduit and one set of fibres. It will never be a competitive environment. Infrastructure that moves bits and bytes around the country is the "road network" of the 21st century and it simply must be under public control if profit gouging is to be avoided. Running a strategic bridge as a toll road until the cost is recovered makes sense but a scheme that gives a private party a perpetual right to price based on customer's willingness to pay in what at best will be an oligopoly is not in New Zealand's interest. If I was government I'd be using my $1.5B fund to spawn SOE's to build a national backbone and local regional networks leaving the private companies to offer the value added services - the taxi cabs and couriers of the digital highway. I have little sympathy for the attention Telecom is now facing.
Posted by Anonymous at 23:07:08 on July 6, 2010
Posted by Anonymous at 23:07:08 on July 6, 2010
The Demise of Telco's
The issue is not how do Telco's maintain their revenues, it is, how do they reduce their costs. They do this by concentrating on the network and allowing all those value add services to be provided by lean mean and nimble organisations. Telco's are (or should be!) good at running networks and need to concentrate on that. Their desire to hand this over to the government just shows how little they understand what their role is and how far away they are form the future! ;-)
Posted by Anonymous at 13:33:56 on July 6, 2010
Posted by Anonymous at 13:33:56 on July 6, 2010
WiMax still alive?
So how many companies have talked about a nationwide WiMax network?
Telecom, CallPlus, WorldXchange, TelstraClear and now Kordia. It just does not work well in NZ's rather damp conditions.
Posted by MarkFwd at 9:29:27 on July 6, 2010
Telecom, CallPlus, WorldXchange, TelstraClear and now Kordia. It just does not work well in NZ's rather damp conditions.
Posted by MarkFwd at 9:29:27 on July 6, 2010
MOST POPULAR
- NZ game industry: Govt support for development increasing
- Raspberry Pi arrives in New Zealand
- Video, connection costs major factors in broadband uptake: ComCom
- Spotify launches in New Zealand and Australia today
- Telco analyst predicts fibre broadband uptake will be low
- NASA on 'brink of a new future' with SpaceX launch
Social Media @Computerworld NZ

Computerworld NZ has now reached LinkedIn! Join to expand your networks and meet others interested in information systems.




